gradstudent86

Mims, thanks for the input. Wondering if you did the MA in Art History or Archaeology and what you did after... I am worried that if I do an MPhil in Archaeology I may not be accepted into a good Art History PhD program should I decide to go back to it. Also, did you find the MA degree from a UK university equal in terms of job placement, graduate school acceptances etc as one in the US? I know that the two systems differ on many points and so I'm curious to know how you fared after completion of the MA. Thank you

I was accepted to NYU - IFA and Cambridge University. I am completely drawn between the two with only 8 days to decide. Help! Cambridge University: MPhil in Archaeology (Option B Archaeological Heritage and Museums) NYU, IFA: MA in Art History Both for entry in Fall, 2009 I an not sure that I will pursue a PhD in Art History as my interests lie more in the study of collecting, cultural property law, heritage studies etc. I hope to focus my studies on the art and archaeology of the ancient Near East. I realize that the IFA is a great, well-regarded institution which offers fabulous connections, a structured program of study, and the resources of NYC and its many art institutions. Cambridge has a great reputation with employers and might serve me better should I decide to apply to law school instead of the PhD in Art History down the line. I am worried that Cambridge's program is a bit too unstructured with most of the work being done through individual research and a series of long papers. I also worry that if I do an MPhil in Archaeology I might not get accepted into a top PhD program in Art History. Finally, the difference in length of the two (NYU being 2 years and Cam being 11 months) is a matter of concern, especially given the state of the global economy and job markets. Any advice or votes for one school over the other are much appreciated. Thank you, under the wire ...