Thanks a lot for the response and for the video link. This is something that I would guess is an important factor in a lot of countries (especially ones with multiple "nations" like Turkey, Russia, the 'Stans, etc, or places with controversial environmental policies, or any number of things), and the Fulbright committees here in the States probably wrestles with the idea of having to accommodate other countries' national narratives, policies, and fears. For me one of the interesting things in reading Chinese scholarship about Chinese Islam has been like you said - the authors routinely demonstrate a way of understanding race and geography that represents a state story, but you can still tell sometimes that they are aware of the constraints and resentful of them. I think the "feasibility" section you point to is really important, since I've heard it can be a real problem getting unfiltered information which I totally agree is where the more interesting projects are, and maybe what is unspoken in all the paperwork is the fact that the researcher should use her/his own ingenuity to acquire information by means that might best be left out of an application going before the China review board. In that video, it's interesting to see how the woman's research focuses on an aspect of Uyghur culture that has been actively promoted by the state as an emblem of ethnicity in order to make it clearer that they are non-central - many of the "56 minorities" recently are the proud owners of these costume-y dance traditions that are performed in the diorama-like picturesque ethnic villages in Xinjiang set up for visitors. It would be cool to hear how she dealt with that.
I wish you all the best! I hope we will both end up at the orientation session.