Jump to content

CCA-B2

Members
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CCA-B2

  1. The 2014 forum has not advanced since they found out that an announcement is not being issued for year. Has anyone hear anything from EPA yet?
  2. I hope we hear something soon. I need closure.
  3. This may seem like a reach, but maybe we will hear something soon, given the Senate confirmed the new EPA Administrator yesterday. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/07/18/senate-confirms-gina-mccarthy-as-next-epa-administrator-in-59-to-40-vote/
  4. Sources: AAAS, Center for Biological Diversity, ClimateWire, Department of = Agriculture, Department of Energy, Energy and Environment Daily, E&E News P= M, Environmental Protection Agency, Greenwire, the Hill, House Appropriatio= ns Committee, House Science, Space and Technology Committee, National Wildl= ife Federation, US Fish and Wildlife Service, the White House APPROPRIATIONS: HOUSE CJS BILL CUTS SCIENCE INVESTMENT On July 9, the House Appropriations Committee released its Commerce, Justic= e and Science and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of Fiscal Year (FY) 2= 014, which includes funding for the Department of Justice, Department of Co= mmerce and several key science agencies for the coming fiscal year. In total, the CJS bill includes $47.4 billion for FY 2014, $2.8 billion bel= ow the FY 2013 enacted level and $350 million below FY 2013 when accounting= for implementation of sequestration. House Republicans have been drafting = legislation under the assumption that sequestration will continue through F= iscal Year 2014. Coupled with the fact that they are simultaneously seeking= to boost Department of Defense spending, non-defense discretionary spendin= g programs are set to undergo even further spending declines if their bills= are enacted. For the first time in years, the National Science Foundation (NSF) would se= e a significant reduction in funding under the bill compare to the enacted = level in the previous fiscal year. NSF would receive $7 billion in FY 2014,= $259 million below the enacted level in 2013 pre-sequestration and $631 mi= llion below the president's budget request. Other key science agencies und= er the jurisdiction of the bill include: * National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: $4.9 billion, $89 millio= n below the FY 2013 enacted level. * National Aeronautics and Space Administration: $16.6 billion, $928 millio= n below the FY 2013 enacted level. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration cut of $89 million is n= ine percent below the FY 2013 enacted amount. Funding would be maintained f= or the agency's weather and satellite programs. The Joint Polar Satellite S= ystem would receive $824 million in FY 2014 and the Geostationary Operation= al Environmental Satellite program would receive $955 million. Research and= fisheries management programs are expected to bear the burden of the cuts. For additional information on the bill, click here: http://appropriations.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=341771
  5. I cannot believe that it is July and there is still no response. It is hard to speculate what the outcomes would be at this point. Anything new?
  6. Okay. Thanks.
  7. That seems fragmented...did she use an incorrect address and her letter was delayed or what this a rejection letter from the internal review? I'm not sure if I can glean anything from just the fact that she received a letter. Thanks for the update, though.
  8. That's interesting. Did this colleague offer more details other than just receiving a letter?
  9. B2 in the DC/Metro area
  10. I would rather wait for a "yes" than receive a premature "no." However long it takes them to decide, it is worth it to those of us that are dependent on receiving the funding. If it takes them all summer (which I hope it doesn't), i'll wait.
  11. Thanks for sharing everyone. And, thanks for the update sone461. It seems like we have no choice but to wait for the announcements, if any at all.
  12. Are we sure that they have not gone through the internal reviews? Because, someone on here stated that they received only one review, which is indicative of not making it through the internal review process. Just asking...
  13. Thanks everyone for posting your updates consistently. Your information has been really helpful with easing the anxiety that comes with waiting. If it is not too much to ask, can we do a roll call of all those left? That way we can have some idea if they've sent out all rejections or only first round rejections. I am a B2 applicant, with no rejection letter, yet.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use