Jump to content

reactiontime

Members
  • Posts

    34
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by reactiontime

  1. I had worked in four labs (two summers, a summer+school year and then full time during 2 year gap before grad school) when I applied with diverse aims (pharmacology, developmental genetics, bioinorganic chem, and pharmacology).  At my Einstein interview (a biomedical sciences PhD program), one professor was very skeptical and concerned that I was flighty and not committed.  When I explained how the diverse experiences tied together and lead me to a firm conclusion of what I will study for my thesis, he understood that the experiences were an asset.  The other professors I spoke to were glad to see my diversity of experiences because they saw it gave me a deeper appreciation of academia.  My passion and ability to adjust to new problems were also assets.  So, you might encounter some haters, but just emphasize how much you have learned in the process.  Also don't say anything negative about the experiences (like everyone quit the group, or I found the new project direction boring) as they can reflect poorly on you.  The adcom doesn't know if you're telling them the whole story and might guess that problems follow you.  Instead emphasize positive reasons for switching (like, I enjoyed the synthetic approaches, but found a great opportunity to explore computational chemistry so I decided to switch). 

  2. I am getting more and more anxious about UCLA's decision! It's so nerve-wracking because I want to call them and ask for my decision, but I don't want to get rejected over the phone. :/ I just want to get the decision e-mail already and stop worrying!

    Word on the street (ok, on facebook...from a current UCLA grad student) is that their yield was something like twice as high as they planned for last year.  As a result, they cut their offers way down this year to balance things out.  So they clearly waitlisted or rejected people that would have gotten in another year.  I haven't heard yet either, but expect they'd probably say more after the April 15th deadline. 

  3. Oh man, this was totally on the website when I checked at 1:26 pm CST: "FastLane will be unavailable from 10:00 PM ET Monday March 31st - 2:00 AM ET Tuesday April 1st for scheduled maintenance. We apologize for any inconvenience."  I saw it and immediately gchatted a friend.  And now it's gone!  No one will believe me!  EEP!

  4. I don't think I want to teach in the future, but teaching experience could be beneficial nonetheless.

    You might be able to TA grad classes--I don't know.  I ruled out medical school/research institute programs because I wanted to TA undergrads.  tbh, I would probably decide on based on where I clicked with more advisers.  Maybe a pro/con list? 

  5. Decision time is coming up, and I've narrowed it to two programs, both in NYC: Columbia or Tri-Institutional Program in Chemical Biology (Rockefeller, Sloan-Kettering, Weill Cornell). Thoughts?

    Great options.  Is teaching experience important for your future career?  Not sure you can get it at the medical school programs. 

  6. Hello, 

     

    I’m a biochemistry and physiology double major at CU Boulder and I'm planning to apply to graduate school for biochemistry and maybe molecular biology starting next fall. I'm slightly concerned about how my grades will impact my ability to compete with other applicants because I received a C+ in physics I (calculus-based) sophomore year. In the later physics classes I took I earned an A (physics I and II algebra-based) and A- (intro to quantum mechanics/physics III calculus-based) so I feel like I've redeemed myself and demonstrated that I'm not incapable of learning physics but that C+ still worries me.

     

    I’m planning to apply to fairly competitive programs in UCSD, UW-Seattle, Brandeis, Northwestern, and UCLA (in addition to backup schools). I’m aware that there are other components of the application which are more important but I’m worried that my application may be overlooked due to that grade.

     

    Can anyone tell me whether my concerns are reasonable?     

     

    I have pretty decent grades (mostly A- and a few B’s) in my chemistry and physiology classes and I’ve been working in a lab on campus for the past 3 years in addition to doing 2 summer internships. I also have two conference abstract publications. I have yet to take the general and subject GREs but I’m hoping to be able to score just above the 80th percentile, at least on the general GRE.

    I got a C in E&M during my first year of college, and things have turned out just fine.  I had a 3.5 overall and applied to chem PhDs with a biophysics focus.  Is there a trend in your overall transcript?  That's typically more of a concern than a single bad grade.  I wouldn't even bring it up in the essay.  No need to draw attention to it.  It sounds like you're a strong applicant otherwise, so you shouldn't worry too much. 

  7. Hi everyone,

     

    I'd like to nip this rumor in the bud -- I am an ACTUAL grad student at Scripps CA, on the grad student committee no less, and I would like to respond to this by assuring you that we are recruiting no differently than we have in previous years (i.e. the vast majority of interviewees accepted). The above post contains factual flaws, such as a mysterious budget shortfall magically appearing within the last 2 weeks and the approximation of stipends -- I can tell you that the stipend at Scripps CA is $30k this year (we just got a bump up 1k! woooo). Additionally, it doesn't make any sense to fly out so many students (think 120 students @ ~$500 each for flights to Scripps CA alone, I can't speak for how many visit Florida because I don't go there!) and put them up in hotels just to later reject them.

     

    I hope this clears things up! If anyone has any lingering doubt, feel free to contact me directly. My name is Ruben, and I don't need to hide behind the anonymity of a psuedonym, and my picture and email address is publicly available on my group webpage (the Shenvi lab) here: http://www.scripps.edu/shenvi/Members.html

     

    -Ruben

    Thanks for posting.  Really makes you wonder about the motive of the previous poster... 

  8. Has anyone made any decisions on where they'll be attending yet? I know it's still a little early but was just curious if I was the only one.

    I still need to visit Columbia and Caltech to firmly decide...but after this midwestern winter, Southern California looks pretty good...  :) 

  9. Congrats!! That's awesome news. I'm still waiting to hear back from Caltech and UCLA. I guess they do international applicants later. Did you have an interview with Caltech, btw? 

    Thanks!  The only interview I had was for Einstein (a biomedical sciences program--I want to do structural bio).  The others have all been acceptances with visit weekends, though I do tangentially know someone who got his acceptance revoked by Caltech a few years ago for not taking the visit seriously.  Interviews seem to be common for international applicants though.  Best of luck! 

  10. I heard from a professor at USC on the 7th (while I was en route to my interview at Einstein no less) with an email from the department the following day.   Visits are February 21/22, March 7/8, and March 28/29 2014.  They offered me a stipend of about 27k and 1k to relocate.

     

    I also got an official letter (pdf) from Caltech on the 6th.  They offered at least 30k and 750 to relocate.  I assume more detailed funding will come later. 

     

    Still waiting to hear from UCLA.  I sent them an inquiry at the beginning of the week and haven't heard anything.  Hope things are going well for everyone! 

  11. Are you going? They offer to pay all my travel expenses but I don't know if I accept this.. I am afraid of making a commitment in accepting the offer and I am not ready to make it,,

    I can't make a separate trip out there (I live in the midwest and am visiting Einstein and Columbia already), so I'm trying to set up a meeting while I'm already in town.  IDK what the protocol is for paying international student travel (like if it's more of a commitment), but they do budget to bring students in who ultimately decline, so I wouldn't feel too bad or awkward about it.  I mean, I wouldn't take the free trip if you are 100% certain you won't attend.  If you're legitimately considering NYU, go for it. 

  12. Hi all, from a mid-sized public university. >24,000. 3.3(cum) gpa. One summer of research. 2 decent LOR 1 shitty one. I do well on standardized test and I have the majority of the summer to practice GRE testing. I would really like to do biochemistry for a masters and I would like to be financed( research or ta'ing is fine). I don't mind going anywhere in the country for education. I also would really look forward to working in a lab or teaching.

    I think the best way to get a good prediction is to talk to your adviser or PI.  Mine suggested I apply to schools that I thought were out of my reach (ie Caltech) despite my somewhat low GPA (3.5).  They have any idea of what kind of honest rec they will write, the way your program is perceived by other departments, and how your stats will figure. 

     

    I would also suggest taking a year off if it doesn't seem like you'll get funding next cycle.  This could help you replace the shitty rec with a good one.  Having full time experience in a lab will help you show you'll be a good graduate student and a good bet for the program to take on and fund. While you said you don't mind moving, you could also try to get into the department you'd want to attend for your masters as a tech.  If you make a great impression to people in the department, they may be more likely to overlook other aspects of your application. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use