FWIW, I think nurye27 is dead on with this response.
My own stats are lower and i don't have a masters, but have still managed to land funded offers with all of the programs i've been accepted to. My recommenders are well-regarded and i worked for a long time on putting together my SOP with close advice from my undergraduate adviser, which seems to echo nurye27's remark that your LOR, SOP, and research agenda (i would add writing sample) are infinitely more valuable than any numerical stats. These are essentially what you're paying for when you get your MA -- names, connections, proof that you can do research, and an idea whether or not what you're doing is something people currently in the field think is important or exciting. Whether you get these when you're an undergrad, through an MA program, or by working as a researcher probably isn't too important, but having them makes all the difference.