People always mention threads about Masters programs, but if you go through all 50 something pages on the forum you discover that there is actually very little information regarding your type of question. There were a few threads about funded masters programs, and the usual suspects were provided (W&M etc). In my humble opinion, I care more about quality and less about funding. I think, look at quality first and then we can consider funding.
I think there should be a thread solely focused on qualities of Master/specialist programs and what their potential rankings are since these are relatively non existent online. For example, you could use scholarly productivity as a guideline for programs but if the publication is only looking at APA schools than this would exclude (a lot of) schools that only offer MA programs (not apa accredited). Furthermore, besides examining which professors/schools align with your interests it can be hard to determine which school is better rated if you get accepted to a number of programs. In a sense masters students usually have less matured interests (which is why they are choosing masters!) so I find it frustrating and a cop-out when people respond to this question by saying "pick a school that aligns with your interests" because one of the very tenets of this path is for students who don't have clearly defined interests yet.
I think in the end, grad cafe could work to help potential master students navigate which school is better ranked objectively and then allow students to make personal choices using that information. Part of this personal choice would stem from your research/academic interest and then another part might be your end goal (in your case Phd)
I know it is frustrating when people keep saying "look at google" "look at past threads". I can tell you I have read through all of those sources and each leaves much to be desired. I have also gone through hundreds of threads on SDN which provided slightly further insight but yeah..It sucks!
Perhaps people applying to masters programs could list the programs and say why they chose this program.
List school and reason with personal factors (I doubt this will catch on as a "movement" but I wish!) I'll start with one of mine:
*All schools in this list should be NASP approved because that is widely understood as a basic starting point*
For example:
Program: School Psychology (MA)
School: Plattsburgh (NY)
Objective Positive Qualities: thesis requirement- financial assistance- Accepts up to 12 credits from another grad program- leave program with comprehensive portfolio
Personal Influence: POI studying topic of interest/Family in area
Objective Negative Qualities (if any): NA
On another note, I have found STUDENT HANBOOK to be really helpful and also reading about the faculty research will give you an idea of what's going on at the school. Also look at what the practicum sites could be, if the campus has a Family Center (many do) where you could gain experience or any other training certificates you might leave with (for example play therapy). Schools that have PhD programs could take less time to finish if you obtain your masters there (so in your case this would be a factor to investigate). I wouldn't really email professors until you exhaust all other options because it can seem like you didn't do the leg work/didn't read their publications/wasting their time by asking questions you could problem solve on your own. If you have a specific question though, it would be okay.
I hope other people add to the list!! *crosses fingers*