Jump to content

mkumar

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Upvote
    mkumar got a reaction from Nyctophile in Books NOT to read-   
    This dismissal of Eliot as both author and woman is, quite frankly, disgusting.
  2. Upvote
    mkumar got a reaction from iExcelAtMicrosoftPuns in Books NOT to read-   
    This dismissal of Eliot as both author and woman is, quite frankly, disgusting.
  3. Upvote
    mkumar got a reaction from cbttcher in Books NOT to read-   
    This dismissal of Eliot as both author and woman is, quite frankly, disgusting.
  4. Upvote
    mkumar got a reaction from igetstuffdunn in Books NOT to read-   
    This dismissal of Eliot as both author and woman is, quite frankly, disgusting.
  5. Upvote
    mkumar got a reaction from poliscar in Books NOT to read-   
    This dismissal of Eliot as both author and woman is, quite frankly, disgusting.
  6. Downvote
    mkumar reacted to ExponentialDecay in Books NOT to read-   
    Firstly, Ayn Rand has excellent form. Considering that somebody must give a long philosophical speech every twenty pages, it is astonishing that her prose feels breezier than Stein or Eliot.

    Secondly, a person who bases their understanding of libertarianism on Ayn Rand, never having read even Hayek or Nozick, or at least the earlier philosophy that informs their views, regardless of whether they consider themselves a libertarian or not, needs to shut the fuck up and sit the fuck down.

    That said, I think that if George Eliot were never taught to read and had 12 children instead of writing Silas Marner and Daniel Deronda and shit, society would be better off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use