Hey everyone!
I was greatly disturbed by the Leiter post a few weeks back with comments from an admissions committee member at a top-20 PhD program for all the reasons people here and on Leiter’s blog made clear. That post, however, prompted me to investigate a nagging suspicion I’ve had about PhD admissions for applicants with MAs: only applicants who attended either a prestigious, well-known undergrad institution and/or an institution with a graduate program in philosophy prior to their MA are admitted to top-20 PhD programs in philosophy.
I looked through placement records of five highly regarded (Leiter recommended) funded MA programs and dug into the backgrounds of those who were admitted to top-20 programs since 2008. Ideally, I’d go back further than 2008, but around that time it gets more difficult to trace students’ histories out – over the course of six years some students have dropped out while others have completed the program, and for those that haven’t, internet records were spottier, personal details on the department website and personal websites were less common, etc. What I found was disheartening. Indeed, almost every student attending a top-20 PhD program who received an MA from a highly regarded, funded terminal program did their undergrad at a prestigious institution and/or one with a philosophy grad program. I did find a few exceptions, but every exception was either an international student or else the top-20 program that admitted them was Notre Dame.
Of course, I do need to qualify this somewhat. I was only able to trace out (or draw from personal familiarity with) 30/51 MA program placements into top-20 PhD programs. It’s entirely possible that some MA students without this sort of undergrad background got into top-20 PhD programs. The fact that every single one of the thirty (apart from the Notre Dame admits) came from (1) a well-recognized, prestigious undergrad institution, (2) an institution with a philosophy graduate program, and/or (3) a non-American institution, leaves me skeptical that there are many exceptions. This is also not to say that there won’t be exceptions in the future – perhaps even to the point where it wouldn’t be appropriate to call them exceptions. After all, MA programs have been pumping out solid students for years now and are earning greater respect in the philosophical community. I sincerely hope that MA applicants from different backgrounds (i.e. not (1), (2), or (3)) can gain admission to top-20 PhD programs in the future, but the evidence I’ve uncovered to this point suggests that they have not in the past (and if they have, they’ve been remarkably rare).
I bring this up because at this time every year, rejections start rolling in and applicants begin considering MA programs. I think that they’re well worth consideration. I, myself, attended a Leiter lauded MA program and have nothing but positive things to say about my experience. I met a ton of great people, learned so much, and had a blast. I think my time was well spent, but I had expectations going into the program that were not informed by this sort of data. If my expectations were informed by this data, I would’ve reconsidered my choice of attending an MA program instead of a decent, funded PhD offer. That’s not to say that students from less prestigious backgrounds can’t improve their applications (but most importantly, their philosophical skills) and get into better PhD programs post-MA. I’ve seen that happen with over a dozen people and I would now count myself among them, but it’s also important to have realistic expectations. Developing expectations about MA programs should be greatly informed by their placement records, but it’s also important to ask what students who got the placements you might want had in common. Strong philosophical skills, stellar writing samples, and great letters of recommendation to be sure, but that may not be all, sadly.