Though I can reasonably understand universities' plights to profit from application season (usually 50 USD from, perhaps, 200+ applicants per grad program?), I find it very offensive that many grad programs are not at all forthcoming about their admittance criteria. At most of the programs I have pursued, the departments are quite close-mouthed about cutoff GPA and GRE scores. "We review applicants holistically," they've often said. Yet committees apparently only "holistically" view the applicants that have not gotten the ax for falling below the GPA and GRE cutoffs. As a fair, hardworking adult genuinely committed to my field of study, I am insulted that I may have fallen prey to the holistic-line and could have saved myself valuable time, effort and money by first determining for myself if I met the basic GPA and GRE requirements. This is not to say that I am not a serious student and that my credentials are poor. I am an honors student and will be soon earning a second Masters degree (am therefore pursuing a PhD, as has been my goal even as a high school student), but my GRE scores are average (which I can be grateful for, being that I was ill with the flu and sleep-deprived from being so sick--of course, adcoms will never know this). I don't mean to rant, but this is terribly frustrating. I simply don't appreciate game-playing when my academic and professional future is at stake....