motherofdragons
-
Posts
3 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by motherofdragons
-
-
Wow, I wish I had this information before I applied. My main issue was an excess of applications -- I had a very low acceptance rate when I applied for undergrad so I think I was overly cautious and applied to way too many grad schools. I also wasn't sure if I was a highly competitive applicant, so I cast a wide net.
Undergrad Institution: Top 5 Public School
Major(s): Molecular Biology B.A., biochemistry specialization
GPA in Major: 3.65/4.0Overall GPA: 3.7/4.0
Position in Class: Somewhere in the middle, but most students in my class were pre-med
Type of Student: Mixed race female w/ green card
GRE Scores (revised version):
Q: 166
V: 165
W: 5.0Research Experience: 1 summer of chemistry research, 2.5 years of research with a well-known high-profile professor in biochemistry.
Awards/Honors/Recognitions: Nominated for Goldwater Scholarship by home institution (didn't win), presented a poster at a national conference.--Results --
Acceptances:
Harvard MCO
Yale BBS
MIT Biology
Stanford Biochemistry
Caltech Biochemistry
Oxford Biochemistry
Cambridge Biochemistry
NIH-OxCam
Attending: Harvard MCO
I was rejected from Scripps but later discovered it was because my application got returned to me in the mail.
Overall Impression: My PI told me before I started that I was insane to apply to 8 schools. He said I would get into at least half of them, and probably all of them. In retrospect I wish I had trusted him more and been more confident in my abilities, and I would only have applied to 3 or 4. While I recognize that my GPA and GREs aren't mind-blowing, I have a very good track record in research and I have been told I am excellent in interviews, so that may have contributed. I suggest that if you aren't sure if you are a competitive applicant, ask a well-established professor at your institution and trust their advice!
-
For people who did not apply to Yale or declined their Yale interview, what is the rationale? I thought Yale was a top school in the Biosciences, but I'm seeing more and more people are biased against their BBS program. Can someone explain this to me?
NSF GRFP 2016
in The Bank
Posted
A classmate of mine had their application returned without review today, apparently the email claimed that their intended field of study was not eligible. This student works on what is essentially a systems biology/cell biology problem, which would fall within the bounds of the Life Sciences category. I took a look and compared our apps and the only real difference I can see is that he checked the "Is your field interdisciplinary?" (paraphrasing) box.
Would that be grounds for a return without review? Also, what is the best way to fight this? The email said he has until Feb 24 to appeal, and I recommended getting a rebuttal letter from the director of our graduate program. Any advice would be appreciated.