If you go to UCSD, you become a rational choice theorists. You learn from the Lakes, Gartzkes, and Slantchevs of the world. If you go to Minnesota, you become a social constructivist. You learn from whoever gave Alexander Wendt's, umm, forefathers. Both are among the best at what they do, but they are day vs. night, penis vs. vagina, gay vs. straight, Mearsheimer* vs. Keohane different. It's hard to see how you could have them ranked 1 and 2 currently.**
*FTW.
**In other words, I do not believe I can express your preferences using a von Neumann and Morgenstern expected utility function.