Lol, I'm sorry it came off that way. Meh. Yeah, some top schools do have grade inflation, but, the 25th percentile of students at schools like H.Y.P. are, statistically speaking, going to be at least the 75th percentile at most larger state schools. I'm not saying they're better future scientists, but merely that they're better at studying for and getting the grades that go into the GPA, and that a student at one of these schools with a 25th percentile GPA would have a 75th percentile GPA at a large state school. We simply know this from the SAT and high school GPA statistics of attendees to both types of schools.
This might even things out if like, Harvard has huge grade inflation and the average GPA is like a 3.6 and the ranked 50 school has an average GPA of 3.0, but that's not nearly always true. Seems like a shame that at a large extent, committees don't really consider the huge influence of context on GPA, and honestly, I feel like it's a topic that nobody ever addresses because they're afraid of seeming elitist. I'm not disparaging anybody or any schools (I reccommend to younger sibilings of friends to aim for a large state school with some top profs in whatever they're interested in), just saying that there's basic statistics which, officially speaking, admissions committees don't really take into account, pushing a lot of good people out of science. I know more people who simply aren't applying because of similar situations.