Jump to content

redhillgirl

Members
  • Posts

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by redhillgirl

  1. 5 hours ago, pingaling said:

    In at Upenn Demography :)

    I am a special case--already at a top sociology program in my second year and looking to leave.

    Im always a little curious as to why people leave their programs. I can imagine there are many possible factors (change in personal life, change of interest,  funding etc)....but can people who are already in a phd program but looking to leave tell us a little bit more as to why they wanna start all over again? (so i can prepare for my future...) 

  2. Got my 1st rejection from duke! Totally expected and isnt top choice so not bunmed at all. Now if im rejected by NW or NYU...i'll be pretty disappointed.

    I hv heard from 3 schs so far, got into 2 of them. Im sure what sets me apart is the SOP - my POI at Wisc said it was very strong and would definitely got me thru the crucial 1st cut, apparently it did.  Apart from it, my writing sample is quite strong too. 

  3. Oh and my 2 cents on contacting POI: im international so what i can do is email. So far i have heard from 2 schs (washington/wisconsin),  got into both (tho im sure im about to get some rejects) , and i did skyped with my POI at wisconsin. For intl students w/o US credentials it is especially important as it adds some nuance to ur otherwise pretty meaningless grades that do not directly convert to US grades. And it was a great opportunity for me to tell my POI sth i think he wud appreciate - that i was a publishing writer n sorta like a public intellectual myself. He also read my SOP and thot my research agenda "would be very comfortable at wisconsin".  It all happened after i submitted my apps, but i think it definitely helped quite a bit.  

  4. 27 minutes ago, MaxWeberHasAPosse said:

    I was given an offer at UCLA and I have a 149 q and 155 v. Do with that information what you will..

    I think what goofylemon means is that it is very unlikely a 148/143 can get into a top program. Thats why he/she called it troll.  I think we all basically agree that it's true,  and no one is saying that exceptions are not allowed. We all heard stories of depts jumping thru the hoops to get someone with abysmal gre scores but exceptional qualities in. But that just doesnt happen everyday. Lets agree to that.

    At the end of the day, scores are scores. There really are no rules in grad sch apps, meaning even if u hv the perfect stats it doesnt guarantee admission;  at the same time there ARE rules, if not who wud bother preparing for the GRE? I myself believe the test is a poor indicator of abilities,  but fact is it is required and it matters. Goofy was pointing out a fact and i truly dun get the reactions. Chill, u guys. 

     

  5. 8 minutes ago, s0ciology1992 said:

    That doesn't make any sense... what "rules" are you referring to specifically? Last time I checked, there really aren't any rules to this game (unless you like, you know, have a rule book for graduate school admissions that states one ought not admit scores below a 160, etc. Lolz). And if GRE scores "dun matter," your GPA, publications, and/or work experience still does...  and if you should be spared any time/money prepping for the test (I'm assuming that is what you're referring to) that only proves the GRE are simply an extension/translation of a capital/worth. ;) 

    No thats not what i mean at all. And seriously, everything is an extension of capital/worth. The smartest students dun always get the highest grades dun they?

    The various sources (i cant quote here as im on mobile,  but like i said,  there are a few useful posts in this forum) that hv been posted on this website and elsewhere make us reasonably believe that GRE is used 1st as a cut-off/filter and 2nd is used to determined who gets some fellowships. Not saying it's everything. AT ALL. In fact if it was, goofy's 167/170 wud hv triumphed over my 166/155 n got into UW (and in fact any program) . But i wud agree with goofy that GRE scores matter to the extent that they are the only common indicator of candidates ability,  and yes, top programs like UW cares about GRE. 

  6. 36 minutes ago, goofylemon said:

    Yay! See y'all Wisconsin admits! I told ya! Thank you. I almost cry (again) when I heard of this T.T . 

    Although I am very happy now, still a little jealous of you Wisc cohorts. Hahahaha

     

    Haha i told u theres definitely sth for u as well! And i really admire u for knowing exactly what u want (u said u were gonna withdraw apps),  i think i hv select dyslexia and will struggle till apr 15 shd i get more than one admits. Congrats again!  Brown is wonderful! 

  7. 1 minute ago, lioneironaut said:

    CONGRATS YOU GUYS!!! So excited for you :)

     

    Can I ask what the content of the email is like—is it a form letter or more personalized? Funding info in there yet? Has your status changed on their website? (I'm still pending, no emails either)

    It's an informal email, dunno if it's personalized but it sounds casual enough. Funding details in formal mail which will come a week later. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use