-
Posts
38 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by diter91
-
-
I took all the methods courses that my psci department offered, and wanted to do more. I took statistics and probability courses in the mathematics department, credit/no credit. Having done well in my methods courses, I didn't think it would matter one way or another to adcomm. I'm happy I did so. I learned a ton and it didn't seem to hurt me a bit.
-
Choose whichever program that's offering to fund you.
If you have more than one funded offer, I agree with @MrsPhD that your goal should be to get strong letters of recommendation. I went to a smaller department to do a one-year MA for this reason and I have no regrets.
If none offering you money (assuming money matters in your case), I would consider doing another round of applications.
- ShropshireLad and MrsPhD
- 2
-
R or STATA for stats (or, if you are really averse to learning programming languages, Minitab is a 'point and click' based statistical software)
Netlogo as intro to agent-based modeling
Zotero for reference management
-
2 hours ago, mcm1 said:
PROFILE:
Type of Undergrad Institution: Public state university in the US
Major(s)/Minor(s): International Studies
Undergrad GPA: 3.7
Type of Grad: MA International Relations, top European university
Grad GPA: 4.0
GRE: 165V, 160Q, 5.5W
Any Special Courses: A few methodology courses
Letters of Recommendation: 2 tenured professors and one visiting assistant professor
Research Experience: 2 research internships in Middle East think tanks, plus research assistant for 2 years in undergrad
Teaching Experience: none
Subfield/Research Interests: International relations of the Middle East, US foreign policy in the Middle East
Other: Book chapter publication, multiple conference papers, a few published op-eds
RESULTS:
Acceptances($$ or no $$): None
Waitlists: GWU
Rejections: Princeton, Yale, Cornell, Johns Hopkins, Northwestern, Chicago, Rice, Wisconsin-Madison, Ohio State
Pending: Georgetown
Going to: Nowhere. Wasn't accepted.LESSONS LEARNED:
This is my second cycle applications, and my second cycle of only getting rejections. Figured since I've read almost all of these threads without ever hearing from anyone who was totally rejected I ought to pitch in my experience.
My first cycle I applied to five universities straight out of my BA, which I believed was the main reason I was rejected everywhere. I tried applying more broadly (11 this time around), upped my GRE from 316 to 325, got in a publication and finished an MA. Thought that would put me at least in the competitive field. Was I still too ambitious? Apparently.
Recently at conferences, I met with some professors from the programs that I applied to after I got my rejections. Heard a variety of potential reasons I was rejected ranging from the fact that one of my POIs hasn't had a grad student in years (why don't they publish these things online?), but nothing concrete. Should I have emailed them beforehand? Probably, but I've heard so much conflicting information on the wisdom of bothering POIs as a prospective that I didn't take the risk.
I do have a fairly specialized field that I work in, and all my published work has specifically focused on my sub-sub-subfield. There's no big US university that is specifically tailored to what I want to work on, so I'm not sure how much that killed my chances.
Anyway, the main lesson is that I have learned zero lessons because I've only received ambiguous signals from anyone I have asked. I'm going to do a third round of applications next cycle (I'll bankrupt myself applying to 20+ this time if I have to), and be less ambitious in the rankings I guess.
SOP:
I think mine was fairly standard, around 500 words. Most was the same for each application, with a "fit" section at the end where I tried to tie my work in with some of the papers that my POIs had written recently. Given the results I got, it must suck though.
Thanks for sharing your experience. Have you considered applying to suitable programs outside the US? Or programs outside US News t-25 that may have faculty interested in the things you are interested in? The parts of your application that you have highlighted are strong (gpa, gre, experience). I don't know what your research interests are, but I would consider going where people have similar interests. Or change your research interests if you want to apply to the same schools.
-
11 hours ago, DarkSideOfTheMoon said:
Anyone else on the waitlist for the PhD admits at Toronto? Have you heard back at all?
Was told second round is going out mid-March, so maybe this week.
-
-
@encyclopediabrown Question regarding waitlist. My top choice has put me on their waitlist. Is there anything I can do to advocate for myself? Would reaching out to DGS or POIs do any good? Thanks!
-
They were posted 3 weeks after the deadline (which I think is unusual because of the size of the department and # of applicants) and about 4 weeks before they usually send decisions, based on prior years.
-
Canadian. Thought maybe they were releasing decisions by subfield. But it looks like those were trolls a couple weeks ago.
-
Is anybody waiting on Toronto? Which subfield?
-
13 hours ago, ElySiae said:
Anyone waiting to hear back from Canadian phd programs? The wait is killing me
I'm still waiting on Toronto. I have a feeling they have been sending out decisions by subfield. What did you apply for?
-
What's the deal with the snail mail?
-
Anyone who applied to Canadian Politics at Toronto gotten a decision?
-
Any domestic (Canadian) applicants received acceptance from Toronto?
-
3 minutes ago, Lilliputien said:
Graduate Administrator
Thanks. Best of luck with the rest of your applications!
-
7 minutes ago, Lilliputien said:
Claim a rejection from Toronto ph.D. program but got referred to their M.A. application. U-Toronto is surprisingly early this year.
Did you get an email from DGS?
-
6 minutes ago, skhann said:
When do they notify usually?
Looking at past years, they usually send out notifications in early March. Their application deadline was Jan 15, so it hasn't even been a month.
-
Anyone claiming the Toronto admit? Seems early.
-
Looking for neighborhood recommendations in or around Washington, DC. It would involve moving there with my partner for 5 or 6 years, so I'd like to invest some time in getting to know the different neighborhoods. I'm lucky to have a partner that has her CPA and works in the financial industry, so we are looking to buy some real estate to live in as a short-term investment.
Any insight on the different neighborhoods surrounding Washington, DC would be greatly appreciated!
-
What schools are we expecting next week??
-
1 hour ago, cedfik said:
Also told the same thing about my undergrad institution
Told this by mine as well. Because of how highly it is ranked and other (personal) reasons, I did an MA at another school. Was told this could work, but no results yet.
-
7 minutes ago, toad1 said:
Not to get back to that tedious conversation on rankings, but I was just wondering if anyone has an opinion on the hierarchy within CHYMPS? My current understanding is that it could be sorted into tier 1: HPS and tier 2: CYM. (And also C being Berkeley - not Columbia).. I could be completely wrong though. Any thoughts?
Please no. Create a new thread.
-
3 hours ago, Clytemnahstra said:
Yeah -- I applied to Toronto and McGill. I get the sense that both won't respond until the end of Feb if not early March. They both accepted apps until Jan. 15th
1 hour ago, arctic_ice said:I applied to UBC and McGill.
No news from these schools.Where are they on your list? I'm finding it difficult to compare them with American schools
-
Anyone here applying to Canadian schools? Toronto, UBC?
Taking Classes Pass/Fail
in Political Science Forum
Posted
I think that the only reason you should be taking courses in mathematics is for your interest. Put differently, you should not take these courses in order to make your grad application look stronger. If you want to learn more about statistics and probability, but you are unsure of your ability, take the first. If you are more ambitious and willing to put in work for the sole sake of knowledge, take the more advanced one.
Again, I don't regret venturing into the Mathematics department. But I did so knowing that I was doing it for its intrinsic, not instrumental, value.