Jump to content

prospective_ecology

Members
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by prospective_ecology

  1. 49 minutes ago, dumpstercat said:

    Does anyone know if they contact honorable mentions right away as well? I've heard rumblings of a waitlist type thing. In what circumstances do you think one would decide not to accept the fellowship? 

    If you win another fellowship that pays more, e.g. the NSF GRFP. 

  2. 2 hours ago, engineerwoacause said:

    Hoping someone applying for a second time, or perhaps someone with inside knowledge, can answer this one: 

    When decisions are released, are we expecting to wake up to an email (one way or another)? 

    Last year my email arrived at 1:29 am Friday morning.

  3. A lot of schools will do two rounds. For example, top applicants will be taken in the first round, e.g. decisions that you hear about in February. As people start declining these offers, another round of admits will be accepted until the total amount that will be admitted are admitted.

    I don't know if this is the case for UCI, but it is the case for a good number of schools.

  4. On 3/9/2018 at 8:54 AM, Marinebio444 said:

    That document was from the original president's request posted end of May 2017. As of February 12, 2018, the cuts have been mostly rejected, and a proposed status quo from FY2017 is the most likely scenario now. That should, theoretically, mean that we're staying at 2000 awards. 

    Source: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/02/trump-rescinds-planned-29-budget-cut-nsf

    Yup, we're staying at 2000 awards this year. A colleague of mine emailed the NSF and posted this screenshot to reddit earlier today. Its basically a response to their email inquiring about the number of awards.

    https://imgur.com/a/mDyQe

  5. And that is not to say that they won't award more, only that they requested 1000. I'm also unsure as to how old that document is and what effect all the legislative fury of February had on it. Right now, I'm looking at it as 1000 awards and pleasantly surprised if its 2000. Of course, all that means nothing to me if I'm not awarded :( though I'll be happy for everyone who does get it.

  6. 23 hours ago, csot said:

    Does anyone else think the formatting instructions were a little strange? They asked for our document margins to be 1" on top/bottom and 0.5" on left/right. I kept second guessing myself throughout the submission process.

    Definitely weird. I set it .5" all around last year on accident and had it rejected off the bat for incorrect formatting, no chance for appeal.

  7. Was last year the last year that current grad students could apply twice, e.g. they were allowed to apply a second time as a grad student because they had applied once before the new rules had taken effect/they were grandfathered in? If it is, I could see it the same way bayesian sees it. Less applicants = faster turnaround. 

  8. They review MS/MA applications during the entire month of February. Realistically, this week would be the first week I would expect to hear from them. I honestly don't expect to hear anything until mid-March. While its probably too late to do anything about it now, applying to only one school is definitely a risky strategy and hope that you get in.

  9. I agree with Sanskriti. I had no acceptances first try, directly out of undergrad. In my second try, I've gotten a few offers already, and waiting on the other universities before making my final decision. Is your family member applying directly out of undergrad? Taking a year off isn't going to hurt them.

    I've always been told by professors not to take an unfunded position. While it is a debt thing, my professors were also of the opinion that the department didn't think highly enough of me to admit me if all they could offer was an unfunded position. While opinions may vary around the reasons why you don't take an unfunded position, its almost universal that you shouldn't accept an unfunded offer.

  10. Undergrad Institution: High Ranked State School
    Major(s): Biology
    Minor(s): N/A
    GPA in Major: 3.5
    Overall GPA: 3.5
    Position in Class: n/a
    Type of Student: Domestic Male

    GRE Scores:
    Q: 159 
    V: 162 
    W: 5.0 

    Research Experience: 

    1 summer of field research

    2 years of field research culminating in honors thesis


    Awards/Honors/Recognitions:

    Honors Thesis

    School Fellowship for Undergraduate Research

    Pertinent Activities or Jobs:

    Volunteer for local aquarium

    Biology instructor for a year

    Any Miscellaneous Accomplishments that Might Help:

    Two poster presentations at international conferences

    Proficient in R, GIS, and Python


    Special Bonus Points: 

    3 outstanding letters of rec from professors who lead their field. In every interview, all the interviewing professors knew my letter writers personally or by reputation. The professor I talked to at Scripps actually told me that there was a lot of buzz around my app just because of the letter writers, however the professor who I want to work with may not be able to take me on in their lab

     
    Any Other Info That Shows Up On Your App and Might Matter:

    Contacted professors at every school before applying - did not apply unless a professor said to put in an application

    Weaknesses: relatively lower GPA

    Applying to Where:

    Areas of interest:

    Spatial and movement ecology

     

    Applying for programs in:

    University of Pittsburg (PhD)

    Stony Brook University (MS)

    Washington State University (PhD)

    Miami University (MS)

    University of Nevada, Reno (MS)

    UCSD - Scripps (PhD)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use