SortOfOld

I was thinking of programs like Carnegie Mellon’s Energy and Public Policy. As I’ve researched, I’ve struggled to gauge how much programs weigh different parts of a person’s experience and numbers. Given the oddness of my background, I’ve tried to find more open-minded programs.

I just took the GRE in late August and scored 168V, 164Q, and 4.5 W, for what it’s worth. I think I stayed somewhat attentive and fresh for a few reasons. First, I only took one simulated practice test, so I might’ve avoided overall burnout on the material. Second, I studied less than one hour per day during my study buildup, which decreased overall burnout, again. And third, I experimented with properly balancing my caffeine and water intake in the weeks prior so I could stay totally amped the entire exam while avoiding the need to run to the restroom. I had this approach down to a science.

Age: 31 Undergrad: BS Nuclear Engineering Grad: JD Experience: 5 years in patent litigation at a large law firm and 1 year as associate general counsel at a midsize manufacturing company GRE: 164Q, 168V, 4.5W Previous Research: 1 year at a nanophysics lab GOAL: I want to abandon being a lawyer and pursue a fully-funded doctorate in engineering policy, public policy, or political science, with a focus on renewable energy and the policy related to its growth. Does anyone know of someone who’s succeeded in making a similar career pivot? How’ve others legitimized efforts to change careers when previous work experience doesn’t logically connect well with desired academic pursuits? Thank you for any insight you can offer.