Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About KeyDoc

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Location
  • Application Season
    Already Attending
  • Program
    PhD Political Science

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. KeyDoc

    Age is a liability for a prospective student?

    I'm sorry the OP's conversation wen t the way it did. Honestly, the only thing that surprised me was how upfront and frank the professor was. Bias towards "undamaged goods" is real. I tell people that doing the straight academic track is the best strategy for getting a well-funded PhD program, but on a personal level I don't recommend it at all. You are missing out on a lot of life experiences and personal growth by doing 9-11 years of higher education all at once. I think in a way departments know this and that's why they offer nice funding packages to young applicants fresh out of their bachelor degrees, especially if it is all in house. They want the young to say yes. I realize it sounds contradictory. Don't look for logic. The admissions process is an arcane ritual and I doubt most people on admissions teams know why they do what they do. It isn't arbitrary. The results are often predictable, but it isn't wholly conscious.
  2. Most universities in the USA are moving in the direction of grade inflation. If anything, they will expect higher grades. Outside of a few very famous schools, they will not know the grading policies elsewhere, whether they are tougher or softer. I recommend brushing up on your English, especially with regards to Americanisms. (You graduated, *=ed* as in the past tense). I have no idea which school DTU is. You should first refer to something in its full form and then put the initials in parentheses before you start using the initialism. What is "Topper's"? Do you mean the top student? No one in America says "Toppers." I don't know if this from British English or some form of Engrish/Singlish common elsewhere, but you won't want to use it in your applications. (And don't mention this because it sounds whiny) 325 GRE is good, but what is the breakdown? I imagine your math is much better than your English. You need to meet certain minimums, but focus more on your quantitative section score. What was your analytical writing? It should be at least a 3.5. Did you graduate with a BS? Or did you graduate with an MS abroad and are looking to get a MS from the USA in addition? > do you think I should apply to UCs (UCI,USC,UCSD) for masters in CS(which are considered GPA centric) Do whatever you want if you have the time and the money. Are you asking if we think you have good chances of being accepted? I am not in computer science, but I would wager even comp sci people may find your post a bit confusing. What I have to say next may seem impolite, but it may be the bitter medicine you need. Are you South Asian? Something about your post makes me think that. I don't know if this is a general discomfort with English, an L1 issue from speaking a language like Hindi/Urdu or a cultural difference, but I find that South Asians tend to demand help with little provided information. You should phrase requests as questions and use the word "please." -> Could someone please help? and not Help me!! Are you expecting a dialogue? It is not likely in a forum to have the flow of conversation. No one wants to do a back-and-forth with you. Provide the necessary details. Don't make the people you are asking to help you do extra research or ask you for more details.
  3. I failed to mention how bad my department is with money. It seems that half of their extra funding packages, sometimes without any teaching workload in the beginning, go to basically unproven 22-year graduates with BAs from the university or nearby. Not they're unqualified exactly, but you have to wonder what it is the department sees in them. There's also the sad, cynical dimension of monetary awards and biased grading to retain certain quotas per sub-field and woo applicants. I know that I'd readily sacrifice the bump in pay I got for this year with my higher workload, continue the same work at my old pay. However, to retain certain sources of funding, the university must retain its high nominal tuition even though a tuition waiver for my friend for one year costs them almost nothing...and the rest of us could never spot her the difference.
  4. Hello, all. Occasional lurker, first-time poster. I promise to return the favor by weighing in with posts of my own to help others now that I am in my second year of my PhD. I am looking for any advice or help -- begging almost. I have a friend, not a US citizen or permanent resident, facing an inability to pay to stay enrolled when she only has one comprehensive exam in her minor field (they are given out in September and January) and a thesis to submit. She is here from the Republic of Korea. She very rarely (read: almost never) gets out because she works so much. She has a master's already and is very qualified. She is in her third year, but her appointment letter for assistantship work did not guarantee funding past her fifth semester. I don't know the exact details and she is a bit embarrassed and shy...I get it. When you move back into academia, get a masters with a mind for a PhD and are approaching 30, you look at your offers and take the best. Applying is very time-consuming and expensive, between SAT scores, mailing transcripts, asking for letters of recommendation . . . and the whole process from application to first day of classes is about a year. I applied to ten schools and only got accepted into two in the end. In retrospect I know what departments and what schools were bad to apply to, being poor matches, and what the field expects and all that and the culture, but when you move back into academia at a later stage in life and now you're looking at finishing your PhD at 35, then possibly at 36 is a little scary . . . and you could apply to a new set of schools and get the same or worse offers the next year. Unfortunately, she has not been renewed. There has been no grievance process or poor reviews. Our department says it does not have the funding. (There is actually a tangled story behind the scenes involving our union's bargaining, administration lying about funds, re-allocating funds disproportionately to certain cohorts in certain fields...that deserves its own post). Because she is on an F-1 Visa, she is not eligible for federal student loans (not that there are state ones), and several funding opportunities outside of our department in special area or topic centers (it's a large university) are reserved for US citizens now resident in the state. feel responsibility as a representative for our union in funding and workplace problems. Up until now, we have had very few issues and most were details about appointment dates and inter-departmental miscommunication. Other students have come in without any funding and secured funding. Others are in their sixth, seventh and even *eighth* years and are getting renewed. Our university and our department seem to game or keep in mind every metric for university rankings and prestige except graduation within the projected four-year path, never lighting a fire under anyone. My friend immediately considered working part-time outside of the school. Looking at the pay and commute times this would entail, it would likely delay her graduation and cost a bundle in the long run. She has some money to make it through a semester living expenses-wise, but not enough to cover the exorbitant tuition American universities charge. I find it obscene that for one exam (albeit intense!) and for a thesis, a student is on the hook for the pay. After the test, the only hard requirement is to informally meet her advisor as she writes her thesis and then submit it for approval. We have discussed her taking time off, going into a suspended status that our university allows, as she writes the thesis, paying a minimum ~$750 to keep her registration with the university active. However, there is no escaping that the way formal deadlines are set up, she can only graduate by paying for two more whole semesters, full price, to get credit for her second field comprehensive exam and the thesis. (Our department requires two sets of comprehensive exams for everyone.) We need the diversity in our department when nearly half of our department is native to our state; I am interested in her thesis idea (after chatting with her on an earlier direction and then her final proposal); finally, it would break my heart for the academic field to lose her and for our group to lose her as a friend. Thank you for reading this far.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.