Jump to content

Szmania

Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Szmania's Achievements

Decaf

Decaf (2/10)

0

Reputation

  1. Anyone, Please check my essay I will have a test on the next week, still be nervous for AWA Argument Essay The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner. "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number of skateboard users in the plaza. There has also been a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza. Thus, we recommend that the city prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. If skateboarding is prohibited here, we predict that business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels." Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation. The following argument is flawed for numerous reasons. Primarily, the argument is based on the unwarranted assumption that the main origin of the number of decreasing shoppers comes from the quantity of skateboard users, rendering its main conclusion, that city should ban skateboarding in the plaza, invalid. The argument fails to provide any justification that the decrease in their business in the plaza comes from skateboard customers. In fact, there are several reasons that why their business is not successful. For one, in the period, the economy is unstable and not prospective which makes shoppers do not want to purchase goods and services in the plaza. Perhaps, the promotional marketing campaign of the plaza would not be attractive to persuade customers to buy any goods in this department store. Possibly, there are a great deal of new rivalry department stores near the Central Plaza that make customers have a variety of choices to go for each malls instead of solely shopping at the plaza. Moreover, this argument assumes that the rubbish and vandalism causes by the skateboarding users. To be fair, other customers can make a dirt to the plaza as well. To strengthen this flaw, this should provides evidences or examples to support this situation, for instance, if every time when skateboarding users play a skateboard, they always leave their stuffs or broken wheels of skateboard in the plaza or the argument itself should state certain convincing case. To exemplify, because they play skateboard in the plaza which make a severe accident to other shoppers leading to unpleasant atmosphere to this department store. Additionally, the argument claims without warrant that if the city bans skateboarding in the plaza, their business will be on the rise again. We cannot be sure for this prohibition. Maybe the skateboarding users are the main customers in the plaza if they pass a rule of this prohibition, their business will be plummeted to the lowest point in the future. This ban does not show any reasons and evidences that if they ban skateboarding users they will gain more customers to the stores or they will have less litter or to reduce harsh accidents to the customer at all. Thus, we cannot assume this action will work for this plaza. Because the argument leaves a plethora of unwarranted assumptions, it fails to make a convincing cause that the number of skateboarding users make a decrease in their business of the plaza. If this argument contained the discussed items above, it would have been more persuasive. Issue Essay Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position. Giving free education has been debated by government officers in many countries recently. Indisputably, some countries have more urgent and severe problems in terms of sustenance. Nevertheless, education is a basic need that individuals should have their own rights to receive to enhance their capabilities without paying their own expense. Therefore, governments should spend a great deal of money on free education for their citizens. Offering free education for students has a plethora of advantages. The obvious reason is that this can enhance quality of citizens’ lives in terms of knowledge and skills. If citizens can access the schools or tertiary education, they will have a better chance to get a better jobs. More specifically, in Finland, the government allocate their major budget on free schooling since kindergarten until tertiary levels. Finnish people can acquire a satisfied career path that they want to pursue from their provided education. Moreover, the Finnish government will have educated citizens who are the high quality of workforces to ready to develop their own countries further. Furthermore, accessibility to education can reduce many crime rates in the society. Thailand is a shining example of superb education. In the year of 1890, such juvenile delinquency in Thailand , this country was revealed that most of criminals were the uneducated or grass-root adolescences since they were lack of knowledge and less opportunities to get a hired job from companies. After that, in the last decade, Thai governments took a serious action to improve an educational quality to their citizens by spending ample expenditure on providing free books and online learning resources such as school uniforms, stationaries and free lunches. This improvement has reduced the figure of criminals rate from teenagers because they are sure to acquire the equality of education which means they will get a promising job in the foreseeable future. Although, the idea of providing free education sounds ideally good for most countries, some undeveloped countries cannot provide free education systems for their citizens. One supportive claim is that it is irrefutable that most undeveloped countries in Africa, for example, Uganda faces the severe loss of supplied natural foods and fresh and pure water to sustain their own daily lives. To solve this problem, the government needs to join the campaign from Unicef to raise fund from other developing countries. If they need to spend money to improve their quality of education, they will be overloaded for debt which may occur adverse consequences in economy aspect to this country. Consequently, offing free education can cause some drawbacks in some cases that should be considered as well. In sum, the government should manage their budget to provide free education for all citizens in their own countries in order to improve citizens’ knowledge, skills, job employment and to reduce crimes.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use