sonicator

wouldn't worry that much about it. i have a BA from a liberal arts school and am entering a chem phd program in the fall. i'm not sure how strict programs really are on required courses. some programs say they want analytical chem, for instance ut austin says they look for at least one semester of analytical. i didn't take analytical and was accepted to ut austin among other programs. on my visits, no one questioned me as to why i didn't take it, in fact we didn't really talk about undergrad coursework at all. i met several liberal arts students on my visits (who i assume were getting BAs-i have no idea if they took pchem or not). i know someone who didn't take pchem and was accepted to uwisc chem (though he did take physical chem for life science-a one semester biophysics class, and his focus is in biochem). i also know organic profs at my undergrad institution who never took biochem. it's important that you take classes that are interesting to you and relevant to your research interests. i was on the fence as to whether or not to take pchem and decided to take it my senior year. i doubt that drastically altered the course of my life or my grad school admissions. of course this is not a guarantee, and some programs may be more strict than others. having research experience is most important. some programs don't even require you to have a degree in chem. i'd say read the admissions requirements for programs you're interested in. i don't think it's that common for phd programs to have undergrad course requirements. based on research experience/gpa you're probably a strong applicant at any school, including top 10 if you have strong recs. that being said, i wouldn't prioritize rank over research fit, so make sure you choose schools that have a few professors you'd be interested in working with