applicant123123

G, VG ; E,E ; G, VG - 2nd year comp sci (machine learning) PhD, honorable mention Who else feels they got stuck with a sub-par reviewer? Consider this feedback: "Judging from [their] GPA, it seems that [their] mathematical and computational skills might not be strong enough to conduct the proposed research, which requires to deal with the highly theoretical problems such as measurement error and uncertainty assessment." ..... Please, someone tell me, you see this is a ridiculous statement. Measurement error, highly theoretical? SCOFF! And GPA... don't get me started. I have a 4.0 now, undergrad was around 3.4/3.6 (can't recall), which is pretty great in computer science. Most of all though, that has nothing to do with MEASUREMENT ERROR. p.s. I got other genuinely helpful feedback on my proposal being too ambiguous/lacking rigor, which I appreciate and saw coming. I'm just pissed at this one bit of feedback that feels targeted and ill-founded. They know our genders, schools, and lots of personal information that can cause bias. I'd almost rather it be bias than to believe this person seriously believes in the above statement.