Hmm that is an interesting question, while it is not what I am suggesting, I think that would be completely contingent on how an individual reacts to a waitlist email. What I'm suggesting is that not receiving any confirmation of acceptance/waitlist is definitely better than receiving a rejection email (Not to say that I know anything about if they send rejection emails or not). A rejection email is a definite "No", while not receiving anything is a "Maybe" or "potential Yes", albeit the latter is associated with the annoying waiting game. Unfortunately I don't know anything about people being waitlisted or if they even sent out waitlist emails to begin with, but I do agree it is quite odd and arguably cruel to not give candidates any response, especially given how important this is to many of you.
I'm very sorry to hear this and can't imagine how stressful it would have to be to make a last minute decision. I am very unsure of how they may accommodate you in these circumstances but that might be a question you could pose to the Global Health Office. You can maybe inquire about their ability to accommodate you if you were to receive a late acceptance
Mhm I definitely agree with this, especially given the fact that everybody has different circumstances and many are applying to more than one Master's program and waiting to hear back from this one. Best of luck to all of you though and I know it is easier said than done, but keep being patient with yourselves.
I haven't heard of people getting rejected in this thread so far nor do I have any knowledge of whether people received rejection emails last year. I'm under the impression (as in I'm hypothesizing and cannot guarantee the validity of what I say), given my experience applying to this, that the faculty actually does not send rejection emails but puts everybody on a waitlist that lasts until the school semester starts or until they fill in all their seats. So they essentially keep going down their waitlist and sending out emails to students and waiting a week for them to respond, and then sending out more emails to compensate for all the people who declined and the cycle continues.
I was deciding between this initially, I think it comes down to a few factors personally. 1. Future goals, are you planning on using this MSc as a stepping stone or is this going to the end of your career? For me, this MSc was a stepping stone for medicine and the fact that it's a 1 year program was very appealing to me because that means I could apply to med school during this program. 2. What interests you more? You'll learn that MPH, while is very similar to Global Health, revolves more around policymaking (to my knowledge) in local contexts, I'd say it's a specific subdivision of global health while Global Health encompasses public health, policymaking but also disease burden. 3. If this isn't your final goal, would you be happy with it being your backup? I think to help guide you, maybe go back to the program's websites and try to read their goals