this is something i also struggled with a lot initially when i got my acceptance. what helped me was really reflecting on my own attachment to notions of "prestige." did i want an acceptance because it meant my work had been recognized by these institutions? or was i serious about honing my craft in a new and challenging environment? and if it was the latter, then the reputation of the program matters a lot less. ironically it also helps to step away from online spaces like the draft facebook page. i think someone on here mentioned that the programs that are most talked about/recognized in the literary world are often not the same as those hailed as prestigious in draft circles. in the end a program is just a program, it's not necessarily an arbiter of good writing or even talent. i think we place a lot of emphasis on being a "good fit" for a program, but this implies that theres some intrinsic trait some ppl already possess that allows them to thrive in a certain environment where others wouldnt. this might be true to an extent but i suspect it also comes down to your individual efforts and what you put into it. so i've started to think of mfa programs more as a tool you can use to develop your writing/career, not as this perfect world waiting for you to step into, cause ultimately it's up to you to make it into whats right for you