Does anyone have a roughly clear idea regarding how admissions committees generally view applicants that hold master's degrees? I've heard mixed opinions on this (i.e., some say it is beneficial to have advanced training, even in a different field so that an alternative perspective can be offered; others say that PhD committees prefer applicants straight out of undergrad so that they can "train" students from scratch; still others, however, say it's a moot point...they could care less and even strictly look at undergrad stats when making admissions decisions).
Can anyone speak to this concern? I'm somewhat in the dark on this matter, and I've been given highly contrasting views...even directly from admissions reps from schools to which I've placed calls. My other concern is that my MA is in a different (albeit related) field.
Good luck to all...I'm empathetic to everyone in a similar boat, and my obsession with checking this (and related) forum grows increasingly daunting by the day.
:shock: