Thanks for clarifying and the advice, emoleys. Thanks to both of you for pointing out and explaining the licensing consideration - it is definitely something I will have to look at more closely. Yes, I do hope to eventually pursue a PhD in Public Health, or at least have that as a strong option.
But for the time being, originally, my thought was that I wanted to pursue a track that was both professionally (and personally) rewarding and versatile in public health social work. I wanted to combine the macro and micro in training and framework for managerial/policy positions while also building a social work component so that I would have the option of also perhaps one day having the flexibility of branching off into my own practice. So more heavily focused on the macro for now (but still having some micro component) and then over time eventually switching perhaps to more micro level focused work.
Initially, I had the idea of the MPH/MSW combo worked out and Harvard was not on the list both because of the lack of this combo but also b/c I thought I didn't have a chance to get in. I went to a grad school fair and was floored by the admissions reps and students I met and what I learned about the program from them. I also just was taken in by their warmth (not at all my mental stereotype of "snooty" Ivy league types) and responsiveness both at the fair and afterwards. I also learned more about the program and emailed professors whose work I found interesting and experienced the same. The MPH program is a great one (yes, as is Berkeley and Columbia) and so I thought that I would consider the Phd track if I ever got in which is why I applied.
What I didn't expect was to get in at all of the above schools and that is good and difficult at the same time. One other thing I learned today was that there is a dual degree MPH/MSW program with Harvard and Simmons College - not sure if I would qualify with the track I have chosen though and I think I missed the deadline for Simmons. So checking into that.
Berkeley is perfect in many ways. Professionally, academically, cost wise, (now license-wise) it would be ideal. Personally though, I'm not sure. Having lived in the bay area my entire life and Berkeley for over 10 years ( and having gone to Berkeley as an undergrad), change may be really good for me - even if for a couple of years. This may be a good opportunity for me to finally try living in a different environment and locale - it may be revitalizing. Is this a good enough reason to give up all that I would have in berkeley? I just don't know at this point but the good points you and michigan girl have brought up are really helping me think through this. Of course any more input would be appreciated. thanks again