I'm posting the latest Harvard admit in Middle Eastern Studies/Art History. I know it probably doesn't directly relate to anyone on this particular thread, but it made me smile when I saw the envelope in my mailbox. I'm still singing the same mantra though... Princeton, Princeton, Princeton. If I've learned anything from this experience, it is that art history and history are in need of significantly more interaction. My past two degrees were in ARH and I felt stifled by the focus on the canon (read largely Italian Renaissance) and conservative theoretical approaches. I am switching to history because I feel as though it will be more accepting of my unorthodox interests and it will broaden my scope, allowing for more comparative work. At the same time, I will never leave my art historical half behind. Visual literacy is essential to my work. I feel as though scholars would benefit greatly from taking a course or two in the other field (ARH/HIS), if for no other reason then to dispel myths about the other... i.e. that art historians have anything to do with creating art. (I can barely draw a stick figure...)