Hi GC,
I'm having trouble deciding between getting a Masters first or a PhD. The idea is if I went for a MS I could get into a top 5 PhD program. However, I've heard getting a MS first doesn't guarantee getting into a better graduate program because some top schools like to get BS students. If I went for a MS I've also heard that it's expected to have top journal publications, best grades, etc or I otherwise might hurt my chances. But then again, the UCLA site says they would rather have MS students apply to their PhD program than BS students. Confusing.
I've recently been accepted to UC Santa Barbara for a PhD in CS fully funded for 5 years. I feel it's slightly superficial, but the new NRC rankings came out and UCSB has been placed among the top 10 for CS Grad programs. I also like the HCI lab that UCSB has, which is what I'd want to research (along with machine learning and other forms of AI). However, I have a few problems:
- The stipend is barely enough to live off at Santa Barbara alone. A lot of UCSB students live with roommates which is something I'm done with after 4 years of roommates as an UG.
- I'm not sure, but it seems like they don't offer an MS along the way. This is something I need to clear up with them, however.
- A dream of mine is to get into the media lab at MIT. A few research groups there are doing amazing stuff. (e.g. affective computing)
I have applied to MS programs, and got accepted to Stony Brook; UConn, which looks like it would be funded; Rensselaer Polytechnic, but I'm waiting to hear about funding. Still waiting to hear back from the HCI program at IA State.
Can anyone cast some insight on this situation? Is it worth it to give up an opportunity at a fully funded, top PhD program so I can live the dream? Or am I truly just dreaming?