I'm trying to decide between Hunter College and Courtauld for an MA in Art History, my area of interest in Modern/Contemporary. There are two very different programs, so I thought I would ask for some feedback from the forum.
Some factors that are influencing my decision:
1) Money: Hunter will end up being considerably more because it is a 2 year program, while Courtauld is just one year.
2) Personal factors: My undergrad degree is in English lit., however, after graduation, I took several courses in Art History at my local community college and state university to gain background knowledge. So, I am using the MA to change fields and to get my feet wet in grad school before I decide whether I want to go on to the PhD. The program at Courtauld is very interdisciplinary so that appeals to me because of my background. It is also focused more on the thesis and is obviously very condensed because it is only one year. However, I am wondering if I should go for a more traditional MA, like Hunter, with a lot of course-work and qualifying exams to bolster my background in Art History.
3) Reputation: Which school is better regarded? This one is a real question mark for me. One of my professors who studied at Courtauld is convinced of its superiority but I am not sure how to judge this. I would like to be able to apply to jobs and/or PhD programs in the U.S., particularly the West Coast after graduation.
I would be so grateful for any advice, ideas or impressions about either of these two options!