HunkyDory

I've read most of the stuff people are listing.

But my big gap is female writers. No Austen, no Brontes, no George Eliot, No Woolf, No Chopin, etc, etc, etc.

Started many of them, but they're all just so awful.

Timshel--why are you folks freaking out so much? I feel like I'm the only person not having an aneurysm.

To answer your question, log in here: https://www.gradmit.buffalo.edu/etw/gradmit.asp

On the bottom left, it should say "application status", and "complete," along with a date.

Timshel--why are you folks freaking out so much? I feel like I'm the only person not having an aneurysm.

To answer your question, log in here: https://www.gradmit.buffalo.edu/etw/gradmit.asp

On the bottom left, it should say "application status", and "complete," along with a date.

I'm really surprised to see people so upset by the test. Like all of you, mine was exclusively reading comp. No quick passage ID, and only a single super POE.

But it made the test so much easier! Almost nothing from the 19th century, which is my weak point. And the IDs you had to do were easier for one reason--

On most of those passages that had 7+ questions, there was almost a path you could weave your way through. Some answers excluded other possibilities on meaning and identification. So it became super obvious what those were. There were at least three or four long passages like that.

I ran out of time too--left about 10 questions blank. Starting moving quickly at the end, so I probably messed up, but I took the shorter passages that I also recognized in the last 10 minutes, and only answered questions that were identifying things like word syntax or literary terms, since I didn't have to read the passage the whole way through.

Overall I'm really satisfied with how the test went--we'll see the results when they're out.