I am working on some Grad program applications and one prompt is:
"Please describe any leadership experience you may have had (250 words max)"
I do have some- in undergrad I was an Orientation Leader, secretary of a large student organization, went to a few leadership conferences. However, I don't really label myself a leader. I can certainly work effectively within a group, and I tend to play a specific role in group dynamics. The example that comes to mind is when I recently served on a jury. I wasn't elected Foreperson (so I wasn't the leader), but I was the "organizer" of the group. I was the one who said, "Ok, we need to elect a foreperson." I kept track of the conversation, took note of details, made sure everyone got to speak. In my current job, I am not a manager or shift leader, but I am one of the point people for training staff on new procedures and I handle our ever-growing list of shoplifters and other suspicious customers, making sure everyone gets clear, succinct information on who to look out for.
On a more general note, do programs really want to fill up with "leaders?" Wouldn't that be like some sports team hiring all the most expensive star players and ending up with a losing record because they aren't working as a team? I'm just picturing horrific failure because everyone thinks they're hot stuff and the group dynamic is totally off. The program should pick me because I fulfill an important role in any group, and NOT the role of leader.
My question is this: do I try to get this point across in my 250 word statement, or should I just suck it up and tell them how I'm a leader?