slu

Not for me, though according to the results search someone heard at late as May.

I applied for this as well, I haven't heard anything yet. Congrats usf2242. Would you care to specify your area of research and your current institution?

Congrats to all who won. I don't think the rejection emails have been sent out yet, I have not received any emails.

Congrats. Yes people (who I assume have won the award) have been able to log in, but so far no one has received an email. By the way, what area is your research?

Well, the number of people accepted amongst the number of people posting on this thread is certainly consistent with the incredibly low win rate, so I'm not getting my hopes up. Congrats to those who won. Unfortunately I am 0/3 awaiting 1 more for this fellowship season. Finger still crossed.

Assuming the results are out, I wish they would just send the e-mails so I can stop thinking about it.

Congrats jcoop.

Same, can't get in

Ctrl Shift J will bring up that tab as well.

Thanks for that, nbren12. I tried your script with the same result, the "incorrect" message. I do hope that those who saw the letter can try and confirm our suspicions.

They reset their database this morning. Everyone was able to log in prior to this reset. Now no one can log in, so far at least.

It's up. I can't log in. Crap.

As did I, 10:34 AM Eastern, though I didn't get the honorable mention.

I am patiently awaiting the result. Does anyone have any information regarding admit statistics from past years?

Ah, I applied to this as well. I guess I will try again next year. Congrats to those who won.

I applied as a 1st year Ph.D. student. My reviews were: IM/BI: VG/VG E/Fair I did not receive a third reviewer. My negative comments were: First reviewer, IM (VG): Discuss more regarding experimental (or otherwise) validation of theoretical and computational results. First reviewer, BI (VG): Discuss more regarding the broader impact of the research topic itself. Second reviewer, IM (E): No negative comments. Second reviewer, BI (Fair): Discussion of broader impacts was absent in previous research document. Also, insufficient discussion of broader impacts in research proposal. I feel very disappointed because I feel I had an excellent research proposal. Having not applied last year, this was my first experience trying to gauge where and how to incorporate BI. The first and second reviewers obviously differed greatly in their opinions of my BI discussion. I just wish I could've gotten the third reviewer. I will definitely try again this coming Fall, but it will be more competitive.