Yeah I checked they do, so is the general rule that for programs like history a stellar verbal outshines a subterranean quantitative?
I'll loan you a few verbal points for a few quantitative points.
I got admitted to the NYU law school, I want to do a joint master's program in history. I got a perfect verbal and a 142 on quantitative. What are the odds that my perfect verbal will overcome my mediocre quant. And also, does the fact that I already got admitted to their law program place me in a favorable position vis a vis an "outsider". If so, how favorable?