[Perfect Verbal, joint J.D./M.A. history]

If you got into NYU law school, you should be able to get into their history program just by reason of obviously being an otherwise qualified candidate. I don't know if you will have an "advantage" per se, though I could see you having an advantage if you have already gone to school for a year there and done well, because then you have demonstrated that you can succeed at their institution.

Do they actually offer a joint program with history? I just know my law school didn't allow you to be enrolled in another program, unless it was specifically a dual program... like the JD/MBA. Just make sure you check with the law school and graduate admissions to verify that you can actually do both degrees at once.

Yeah I checked they do, so is the general rule that for programs like history a stellar verbal outshines a subterranean quantitative?

I feel so odds that you have perfect verbal but low quantitative. I have a low verbal but almost perfect quantitative. I don't know how to decide about my test.

I'll loan you a few verbal points for a few quantitative points.

[Perfect Verbal, joint J.D./M.A. history]

I got admitted to the NYU law school, I want to do a joint master's program in history. I got a perfect verbal and a 142 on quantitative. What are the odds that my perfect verbal will overcome my mediocre quant. And also, does the fact that I already got admitted to their law program place me in a favorable position vis a vis an "outsider". If so, how favorable?