albstaten Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 Won't 30k satellites be very expensive, not to mention resistance from NASA and the ESA, why not place something like 1000 instead, or even just 8 gigantic terabit speed satellites up there? would be a lot cheaper and no controversial sky pollution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now