lkw0922 Posted October 20, 2010 Posted October 20, 2010 Hi, I'm an asian applicant. I have three professors who are going to write LORs for me. Moreover, I have a US army colonel who is willing to write LORs for me. Usually letters from professors are better, but I heard that professors do not 100 percent believe the LORs from asian professors. (I am not sure about it. I just heard.) Because a colonel is my supervisor and we spent one and half years together, he is going to describe personality. However, he may not comment my potential research ability. Can you advise me? Thank you for replying
adaptations Posted October 20, 2010 Posted October 20, 2010 I would go with the professor, unless you are applying to a professional program where work experience would matter more.
starmaker Posted October 20, 2010 Posted October 20, 2010 If you are applying for a PhD or academic master's, go with the professor (unless the colonel has a PhD - but even then, a "personality" recommendation is not very useful). The people making the decision want to know whether you will do well in the program. They are going to give more weight to the word of someone who has been through such a program themselves, and to the word of someone who can attest to your specific abilities that would allow you to succeed (personality is good, but you need the talent, the background knowledge, and the skills - personality alone won't do it for you). If you are applying for any fellowships, there may be some that do care about personality, for which the colonel's letter would be useful.
lkw0922 Posted October 21, 2010 Author Posted October 21, 2010 Thanks you so much!! I think you are right. professors can say more than my personality.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now