asleepawake Posted March 14, 2013 Posted March 14, 2013 (edited) I remembering seeing Bryn Mawr in the old rankings and googling it trying to check and the program and then being all . . . They don't even have an MA. Edited March 14, 2013 by asleepawake nothingatall 1
ishmael Posted March 14, 2013 Posted March 14, 2013 Are you kidding me? Bryn Mawr has no English graduate program. The USNWR Rankings really ARE bullshit.
Drol Noryb Posted March 14, 2013 Posted March 14, 2013 Are you kidding me? Bryn Mawr has no English graduate program. The USNWR Rankings really ARE bullshit. I think the reasoning was that they are so cutting edge that they don't even EXIST yet. asleepawake and lisajay 2
sebastiansteddy Posted March 14, 2013 Posted March 14, 2013 Or their undergrad English program is SO GOOD that it leads to a TT job.
TripWillis Posted March 14, 2013 Posted March 14, 2013 I'm tellin' you guys, NRC rankings are much better. AND my school is ranked higher there so... there. cicada123 1
ishmael Posted March 15, 2013 Posted March 15, 2013 The NRC Rankings are just so hard to read... so many NUMBERS. ZacharyBinks 1
asleepawake Posted March 15, 2013 Posted March 15, 2013 I'm tellin' you guys, NRC rankings are much better. AND my school is ranked higher there so... there. Butttt Buffalo is ranked so much lower and WVU isn't ranked at all! They need to update.
no_foam_cappuccino Posted March 15, 2013 Posted March 15, 2013 The NRC Rankings are just so hard to read... so many NUMBERS. I know...I feel dumb saying this, but I honestly don't even know if high numbers or low numbers are better on that list. I've even tried reading the methodology page. My only evidence leading me to think low numbers are better is that Harvard's rankings are low.
NowMoreSerious Posted March 15, 2013 Posted March 15, 2013 I'm tellin' you guys, NRC rankings are much better. AND my school is ranked higher there so... there.NRC has some WTF rankings too. Like there's some skew that makes certain rankings appear way way off. I know US news sucks, but at least it sort of passes the eye test on first glance. NRC has some wacky shit going on in it, and I don't even have the time to figure out what or why.And before somebody calls bias, the schools I figure to end up at are ranked about the same in each one.
jazzyd Posted March 15, 2013 Posted March 15, 2013 I'm tellin' you guys, NRC rankings are much better. AND my school is ranked higher there so... there. So my question is, are the NRC rankings in fact better... or do we just like to see the most elite of elite programs knocked down a peg or two? nonysocks 1
Taco Superior Posted March 16, 2013 Posted March 16, 2013 (edited) for anybody having trouble sorting the NRC rankings, if you look at them on phds.org they're much easier to figure out. They organize them for you according to different emphases. http://graduate-school.phds.org/rankings/english Some of the data is pretty old and therefore inaccurate, however. Edited March 16, 2013 by paulmilkesloones
zielschmerz Posted March 25, 2013 Posted March 25, 2013 Perceptions of a program's prestige certainly matter on the job market, but the perceptions that matter will be those of hiring committees, which will certainly be far more nuanced and informed than any rankings. And English profs are exactly the kind of people to resist the rankings of an organization like US News and World Report. However, it's also true that many, many professors are not at all up-to-date about perceived prestige of other programs, or even who is still on which faculty. I guarantee that the people reading this board are more informed about such things than many sitting faculty. And perversely, given the realities of seniority, it's often the people who are most out of touch who have the most pull on search committees. I imagine it is true that hiring committees have more nuanced understandings. That said, I saw a forum post on the Chronicle (okay, so most anecdotal evidence ever) by a prof who said that her dean actually got involved in the hiring. Long story short: the good news is hiring committees will go with the candidate from the lower ranked school based on merit; the bad news is, this dean, at least, was in a position to say, "No, hire the one with brand recognition." (To impress prospective freshmen's parents? I don't even know.) But what makes my feelings even more mixed is that -- yes, of course, a job is a job, and beggars can't be choosers... but the idea of arriving all bright-eyed and bushy-tailed to a department that, unbeknownst to me, resents my presence is...not ideal (read: kind of makes me want to cry).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now