PhilApplicant Posted May 29, 2014 Share Posted May 29, 2014 I was thinking the opposite. Shit philosophy is so very often in the eye of the beholder. True. But I was thinking something along the lines of the worst philosopher being the one who has argued for the greatest number of false positions. But then I remember that a lot of my favorite philosophers are those whose views I so often don't even agree with (e.g., Jerry Fodor, David Lewis, etc.). So maybe (probably) there's a fact of the matter about who has argued for the greatest number of false positions, though it doesn't reliably track the quality of the philosopher? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dgswaim Posted May 29, 2014 Share Posted May 29, 2014 True. But I was thinking something along the lines of the worst philosopher being the one who has argued for the greatest number of false positions. But then I remember that a lot of my favorite philosophers are those whose views I so often don't even agree with (e.g., Jerry Fodor, David Lewis, etc.). So maybe (probably) there's a fact of the matter about who has argued for the greatest number of false positions, though it doesn't reliably track the quality of the philosopher? I'm thinking this topic could turn out to be an interesting paper on epistemology... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MakeYourself Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Philosopher with the worst name: PMS Hacker (Peter Michael Stephan Hacker). He's a Wittgenstein scholar at Oxford. FU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now