RP15 Posted November 1, 2014 Posted November 1, 2014 After taking the Manhattan tests and ETS powerprep tests, am I the only one who thinks that ETS is easier for the quantitative?? Not sure which third part test prep is best... (for quantitative) But it seems like if you're able to nail down the Manhattan quant, you're gold for the ETS quant. Thoughts?
edenhazard Posted November 1, 2014 Posted November 1, 2014 Both are pretty much the same IMHO, ETS may be slightly simpler. Magoosh is the toughest, though.
Robes Posted November 1, 2014 Posted November 1, 2014 I wouldn't say it is easier -despite I scored around 155 on the Manhattan tests and ended up with 160 in the quant section of the real GRE. I simply think that Manhattan Quant is filled with many time-consuming problems you would never see on the real GRE test all together. Anyway, just keep practicing with Manhattan and, above all, with the ETS material (always timed, of course): it is by far the best one in predicting your real score.
Trisha94 Posted November 1, 2014 Posted November 1, 2014 ETS Powerprep is deceptively easy, especially quant. The verbal section, though, accurately represents the actual test. Princeton Review was the most comprehensive. I'd suggest taking that for an good gauge of how you'll do on the final thing.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now