tryme316 Posted July 12, 2009 Posted July 12, 2009 Like do they look for published studies from the applicants' resumes? And how about the GRE? What should be the minimum?
commcycle Posted August 8, 2009 Posted August 8, 2009 More publications will never hurt you. Unless you have been publishing for ten years and admissions would be confused as to why you're applying to a Ph.D. I don't know if Annenberg "East" publishes average GRE/GPA, but Annenberg "West" does.
naptown Posted August 8, 2009 Posted August 8, 2009 I don't know if Annenberg "East" publishes average GRE/GPA, but Annenberg "West" does. They do, at: http://www.asc.upenn.edu/prospective/Gr ... Stats.aspx The stats for 2007 aren't up anymore, but are available at: http://web.archive.org/web/200708252056 ... /stats.asp Obviously, I've given this some thought. :-D
naptown Posted August 12, 2009 Posted August 12, 2009 I would like to hear from successful applicants (at any school, really) on what they felt made their application stand out (beyond the basics we all know).
commcycle Posted September 11, 2009 Posted September 11, 2009 Naptown, I got in last year for a comm doctoral program at a strong school. I'd suggest getting strong, specific recommendations from professors that the admissions committee members know. Accent your potential for success in their program. Mention a few areas of research that would fit with current professors. Don't raise weak areas in your SOP! I think there's a temptation to "explain" your application in a way that makes sense to you. For instance, say you bombed stats 101 in undergrad. Don't mention it. They might never look through your undergrad transcript to find out. Have a history of completing projects, particularly those that lead to publications.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now