Jump to content

G2A

Members
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by G2A

  1. My understanding is that it is technically possible but it is not recommended. There are two ways to do it - one is you enter with the tourist visa and then go through a process of a change of status to a student visa in the US, once the visa is valid (I don't know how the details work, though). The other is that you enter on the tourist visa, travel and whatnot, then leave to e.g. Mexico or Canada and re-enter on the student visa. The reason that doing this (on either version) is not recommended is that it would make your entry on the tourist status suspicious, as if you were entering to start your education early but without the proper status. I'm sure there are people out there who did it successfully, so it's a question of risks and rewards. Do you really need to enter the US more than a month before your program begins?

    Thank you for your replies fuzzylogician.

     

    My reason is two-fold, I've been invited to a wedding a couple of months before my "allowed entrance" and I will do fieldwork in the month prior to the program start. I just got home from a 2.5-yr stint as a grad student and my stuff is in storage at the moment, waiting for a cross-country haul as soon as I get there. Also, since I will be there for a while now, I'd like to go and see some possible apartments/houses before I arrive.

     

    I called the Embassy earlier today and they said that it would not be a problem.

  2. Dear all,

     

    I've been trying to find a topic on this subject but without any luck. I've accepted an offer to start a PhD at an American university and am currently making plans for the summer and early fall. The F1 visa I will receive will allow me to enter the the country on July 25th. My question is, am I able to enter the U.S. prior to this on as a tourist (visa waiver) despite me having the F1 visa in my passport?

     

    Any suggestions/comments would be highly appreciated

    / G2A

  3. Although I agree with most of what has been written in this topic, I feel like there has been a lack of nuance when it comes to blogging. I do not blog. If done right, however, I think it can be a powerful tool during some points of one's graduate education. This post is a good example:

    http://downwithtime.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/on-blogging-and-collaboration/

     

    Having that said, OP's energy is better spent elsewhere in my mind. BOL though.

  4. I need to find a new place for September since my room mate is defending his dissertation soon. I do not plan to start looking for another couple of months at least.

     

    @Jbenrod, I've been very pleasantly surprised by the public transport system here. The light rail is great (going N-S) and a second line will open up in the near future (W-E). Both intersect at the University. Busses come fairly often and are always on time. There is also a campus connector (from the East and West bank to the St. Paul campus) which is free and some people can use as their regular bus since it does stops along the way. Overall, I'm impressed by the system (means a lot coming from a European). That being said, there are definitely a lot of characters on the bus lines. If you don't want to talk to them, don't worry, they'll talk to themselves.

  5. I guess maybe your field is different but in mine if you get a revise and resubmit, usually you resubmit to the same journal that has already dealt with out manuscript once you're done with your revision. You don't go through the first stage of submission, get an R&R and then take your submission elsewhere - that tends to upset editors and reviewers.

     

    I agree but nothing in OP's posts suggest that he/she got an R&R. From what I understand, the manuscript went through to review but was rejected (flat out).

     

    OP, is the ecology journal you submitted to high-impact? If you think it may not appeal to the broader ecology community, would you consider submitting it to a more specialized ecology journal?

  6. I agree with Dal PhDer, it is a great way to get your feet wet if you are considering teaching in the future. One thing I'd like to add as a pro for TAing is that it gives you a different perspective on your own work. Being able to explain what you do (or something related to what you do) to a non-expert is a really good skill to have, and it is not always easy. Scientists will always have to prove why their work is relevant to the larger community and I think communication is becoming more and more important.

     

    I remember being nervous when I first came to grad school. Not only had I never TAed before but English is not my native language and it was my first year in the US. There were ups and downs but once you get into the grind, it isn't that bad. Sure, not all students care about the class but the people that are genuinely 

    interested more than make up for the ones who aren't. This semester, I am back to TAing after a year of RAship. I would lie if I said that getting up at 6 am two days a week is fun (never got up before 10 last year) but I can honestly say that if it hasn't made me a better researcher, it definitely has made me a better person.

     

    So don't let the prospect of TAing stop you from going to a good program.

  7. I think some people put more weight on these types of questions than others. You obviously have very strong feelings and perhaps you would not be happy there. However, I must ask: did you not think about this before you applied? The scandal was known well before even the earliest of application deadlines.

     

    Again, these factors are very individual. If I were to apply to Penn State, I would not factor in Sandusky. On the other hand, I would never attend Boston College because of political reasons. I doubt that many people would give my reasons any thought when they apply there.

  8. Yeah, funded. 

     

    I've been asking around and reading things about UIUC in my discipline/subfield, and it sounds like a great place to go from what I've heard so far.

     

    My first choice would probably be Yale/Michigan, but I'm not really counting on either. It'd be a hard choice between University of Pennsylvania and UIUC though.

     

    Where are you at?

    I'm currently at Minnesota, finishing up a masters. Contemplating doing a PhD somewhere else in the US, starting next year.

  9. I am a international student just finishing my masters at a Big Ten school. I would not have come if it wasn't for full funding. I did TA the first semester here, but have been fortunate to been given RAs since. My department offered a five-year ride and I think they assume that most people do a masters + PhD. I've talked to another international student in another department who had a similar experience.

     

    I have a feeling it will vary from university to university, but also from field to field.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use