Jump to content

Parisienne

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Parisienne's Achievements

Decaf

Decaf (2/10)

0

Reputation

  1. To give a quick answer to the first set of questions you ask : 1) Yes, getting a student job with zero French skills might be difficult. However, again, there are a few options you could check out (giving private English lessons/tutoring for example). You might want to contact Sciences Po’s American Center to find out more about how they usually help out U.S. students with finding jobs. 2) You have to be sure that the E.U is what you’re truly interested in right now if you decide to pursue the Sciences Po Masters in EU Affairs. As the above poster said, Sciences Po is well known and regarded in France & Europe, and this degree will help you in getting jobs in say, E.U lobbies, or European think tanks. It’ll also help you get a job as a parliamentary attaché if that’s something you’re interested in. But if you're not hell-bent on EU affairs, or if you're thinking about moving back to the U.S., that degree wouldn't be the best choice. My general advice is, if you’re not sure about what you want to do with the degree, how you want to leverage it, and if it’s the right degree for you, then work for a while, and defer application until you’re sure. Extra prof. experience is always valued obviously, and you can get a Master’s at any given point, but make sure you know what you wanna do with it to avoid wasting time & money. 3) Sciences Po Avenir is not super helpful… They have a good website with interesting offers, especially for internships, but when I was there they weren’t the best helpers. 4) I really don’t know anything about the MPA degree, so I’ll just refer you to what the above poster said
  2. Hey there, I'm French & studied at Sciences Po, so hopefully I can help you with this as well. 1) Your social life: not speaking French shouldn't impede on your social life at Sciences Po per se, since there are many, many international kids who attend this school - particularly for their Masters - and obviously, the common language is English. In my experience, the international students at Sciences Po are all fun & pretty outgoing. However, the same can't be said of i) French people in general and ii) French students at Sciences Po. First, what other posters have said is true - French people, unfortunately, can be cold and difficult to approach at first, so striking up a convo with a French person won't necessarily be easy if you don't speak French. However, as the others have said, they do truly appreciate it when people make an effort to try to speak French; also, the younger the person you talk to, the nicer that person is likely to be and the more likely is is that this person speaks English as well. Second, You'll notice that French students at Sciences Po either hang out with a predefined group of people or keep to themselves, and that's very specific to ScPo (not all French students are that way). You definitely have to be the outgoing one if you want to strike up a friendship with a French kid. But once that happens, you'll truly be friends, as opposed to what I've experienced in the U.S. (American students being extremely nice and outgoing to you, and, being used to French-ness, you think that means you found a new best friend, then you realize they're just that way in general with everyone and that it really doesn't mean that you've become friends with that person). So - finding international friends at ScPo will be easy; being friends with French kids will be less so, but if you're outgoing & make an effort to speak French you should do fine 2) Finding a student job: it'll certainly be difficult in the sense that yes you do need to speak French for 99% of student jobs you'll be applying to. There are a few tricks though: for instance there's an awesome American diner in the heart of Paris whose waiters/waitresses seem to be exclusively Americans who speak pretty poor French; or you can always try to find a job in an American/British library/bookshop. You could also try doing a few hours at the Sciences Po library. 3) Taking advantage of university resources: it'd certainly help if you could understand or at least try to make minimum sense of the job/internship listings available on the career website, that's for sure. If you work intensively on your French before going to ScPo though, you should be OK and you can always ask for help from the people in charge at Sciences Po of the international students. In other words: if you try to work on your French intensively a few months before leaving, you should be OK & you'll be able to navigate the Sciences Po world just fine. I've seen many internationals at Sciences Po whose French was pretty poor, and they did OK. Plus, you'll learn a new European language in the process (particularly useful for working in EU affairs, and ScPo has great recognition in the EU milieu)and above all, get to live in gay Paris! Voilà - hope this helps!
  3. Thanks for your input guys. Yeah, I think I may have read a thread in the past in the Gov't section, but I still had questions & I guess I also wanted input from this year's batch of poli sci applicants who have applied to both types of programs. My feeling so far is indeed that it isn't necessarily going to make a gigantic difference in your professional life. Perhaps in some areas such as public health, a policy PhD is required. But, I've interned at the UN, and although there were a few people who had gotten a PhD, most of them simply had an MPA/MPP. So in terms of getting your foot in the door of these institutions, my feeling is that a PhD can help but isn't all that necessary; however, I don't know whether it makes a difference in terms of promotion & moving up the ladder later on. I guess the exception would be the IMF, which seems to have a strong preference for econ PhDs (although I'm sure people from the Political Econ program at the Kennedy School would have no problem getting in). Sigh. This is such a confusing issue to me! The thing is, I'd absolutely *love* to get a policy PhD in political economy, but 4/5 years is a long period of time to be spending in school when you're not 100% sure the PhD is going to make a big difference in your career relatively to just getting an MPA.
  4. Hello fellow posters, I come to you with questions regarding policy PhDs. I’ve been reading the admissions thread, and this issue was mentioned, but I guess I’d like to know more about your views on these programs. I’m very interested in schools that offer such degrees (WWS, Stanford, KSG’s Political Econ & Gov’t program) so I’m largely playing devil’s advocate here, just to hear what other people have to say about this. OK so my main concern relates to the “usefulness” of public policy PhDs. First, say you want to work in academia, and really just conduct research: it seems to me that it makes much more sense to go after a normal poli sci PhD than a policy one, unless you specifically want to work at a policy school. Second, suppose you want to work in policy-related areas, and are looking to get this PhD to get some in-depth expertise before joining a think-tank, the IMF, what have you. In that case, is the PhD really necessary? Isn’t it sufficient to build expertise by getting an MPA/MPP then working as soon as possible and building your expertise as a practitioner? And even if your career goal is to go back and forth between the policy world and academia, I suppose you could still publish & teach a class or two once in a while (at least at a policy school) thanks to the expertise you’ve built in your job, and that a public policy PhD wouldn’t be a requirement to do that. For those of you who are applying to both normal poli sci PhDs and such policy programs, what’s your rationale? Thanks in advance for sharing! I’ve been debating this issue with myself only for too long and need outside input on the matter
  5. Many thanks for your advice, it's definitely very useful information. I'll definitely follow your advice when the time comes! Thanks again
  6. Thanks a lot for the very helpful responses everyone! My problem then, as it appears, will definitely be finding the time to practice intensively & regularly, and getting in the mindset of the exam (especially since we almost *never* take standardized tests in Europe). I definitely don't have the time to take a class, and I guess I'll have to find the motivation to study efficiently for it on weekends -- my job is full-time and pretty demanding in terms of hours. And thanks a lot for all the references regarding books, practice tests, etc. I'll definitely take a practice test before I dive into this to see where I stand and how much time this will likely take. 700+ was the ideal target I sort of had in mind indeed, so everything that's been said so far in this thread pretty much confirms what I thought. Thanks again for all the help people!
  7. Apologies if I didn't post in the right forum. Honestly I just thought I'd post my question here because I wondered whether applicants to certain fields studied more for the GRE than others (in economics for instance, given the importance of the quant score), so I wanted answers from poli sci applicants -- that said I'm sure the mods will move this post if they deem that appropriate. Anyway -- thanks for your answers. 1h per week is definitely doable -- I was just wondering how much time commitment is needed to prepare for this properly (for instance, is 6 months a good timeframe for prepping & taking the test?).
  8. Hey folks, A couple of questions about the GRE: 1- How much time did you take studying for it? Haven't started yet, thinking of applying for Fall '11, and I have a full-time job, so...the prospect is stressing me out; 2- I'm not American & haven't studied in the States (except for one year abroad): will that make schools more or less demanding regarding my GRE scores? Thanks in advance for your helpful answers
  9. I second this. I'm European as well, and the academic job market will definitely be tougher for you coming from a European university than an American one (except perhaps for the LSE). If you can do your PhD in the U.S., then definitely go for it and -- I agree with Sanssouci -- try to squeeze in a year abroad in Europe if you can. Also, as someone who's studied in both the U.S. & Europe, I can fairly say that the resources European universities have can in no way compare to those of American schools. Certain American towns & cities admittedly can't compare to London, Paris or Berlin, but the conditions in which you'll be studying in the States will definitely be much better.
  10. Many thanks to all for the useful feedback! All points are well taken. If I summarize: 1- when there's good fit, it's probably obvious and it shouldn't be difficult making an argument for it in the SoP for example; 2- the more specifically my interests match those of other professors, the better the fit (that's obvious enough); 3- you can look at fit through different lenses (thematic or regional) and make your argument accordingly; 4- when browsing through a professor's profile, there's good fit if I'm interested in his work and can see how we'd complement each other/mutually learn from each other's research. Stormy Waters - I'm interested in comparative state-building and more specifically, how economic policy and institutions (such as monetary policy & central banking) help or hinder democratization processes and state-building. Since my interests lie at the intersection of political science & economics (I've studied both), and because what I'm interested in is studying the design and effects of policy, I've so far been focusing on programs that offer PhDs in public policy with a focus on political economy. I'm also looking at poli sci programs that have strong political economy subspecialties (but I feel that a PhD in public policy/affairs would suit my interests better). I'm still doing research on professors at different programs & in the process of determining where I'd fit well
  11. First, thanks to both of you for your replies! It's really helpful to be getting feedback on this issue Actually, my intuition & thinking was that my 1st example was that of a good fit, and the 2nd example, one of a "so-so" fit: suppose I browse through the papers/CV of the imaginary professor from example n°2. I find out that, sure, he's interested in political economy too, but has been so far mainly interested in issues relating to growth & development economics and has never written anything regarding monetary policy for example, whereas I'm really interested in the politics of central banking. In terms of field, both research agendas pertain to political economy, but those are two very different issues. Do you still think that this would qualify as "good fit"? In the first example, professor and student are both interested in the same general theme (democratization) within a certain subfield (comparative politics). On the other hand, the second example, in my view, would've been similar, in the field of comparative politics, to having a student be interested in democratization and having a professor focus his research on issues of ethnicity. What do you think? Thanks again
  12. Hi all, While most of you have already applied for 2010, I'm still in the process of considering applying for PhD programs and doing research on schools/degrees/admissions process etc. So apologies for this beginner's question! OK, so I'm wondering how one can determine "good fit" with a school's faculty. I've read that good fit can be determined by matching interests with 2-3 members of the faculty. This is where my question comes in: how precisely should my interests correspond to a professor's interests/research agenda in order for me to determine that our interests actually match? Example: let's say I'm interested in comparative politics with a focus on democratization in the Middle East. Let's say I find a professor who's interested in the resilience of authoritarian regimes, with a focus on, say, China. I'd tend to think that our interests match because although we're not interested in the same region, there's obviously a common theme. Am I right? Other random example: I find a professor who's interested in political econ, in the sense of how politics & economics influence each other. I have a similar broad field interest, but I'm interested in the interaction between monetary policy & politics, whereas he's more focused on politics & issues related to growth. Could there be a good fit there? Or do our interests match only too broadly? Thanks in advance for your help!
  13. A grad student in a top institution told me that emailing professors ahead of sending in your application is generally speaking a good idea. I think it can help if you're interested in that professor's research, are a bit familiar with it, and perhaps have questions regarding how his interests could fit with yours. No? It doesn't necessarily turn out to be suck-upy. I don't have that much more info or experience with such issues (haven't applied for this round), but that's just my 2 cents!
  14. Sorry to be barging in on this thread (not applying for Fall 2010), but I was wondering about this too. I haven't posted much since joining this forum, and, like cpaige, am not worried about anything I might have written, but it's always good to know whether adcoms do check out these boards or not.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use