Jump to content

Swagato

Members
  • Posts

    748
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Swagato

  1. Fair enough. Having lived in cities of varying sizes (New Haven, Chicago, NYC, Albuquerque...) I can say that Chicago is actually a strange mix of small-town ambience with many of the attractions of a major city. While you get your major cultural attractions and downtown fun, you also find a very relaxed vibe that is definitely not present in, say, NYC (at least for me). It's worth thinking about.

     

    Also, UChicago is in Hyde Park, which definitely feels somewhat detached from the rest of the city. Not as familiar with Northwestern, but I think that, too, is in a more secluded, smaller area.

  2. I would treat SOP word requirements, especially if any indications are provided, fairly seriously. The SOP is not only an expression of yourself as a future scholar; it's also an indicator that you can put together an excellent project proposal (something academics will be doing for the entirety of their professional careers). On a more practical level, yours will just be one among dozens of SOPs being read. Why needlessly provoke possible irritation with a document that flagrantly exceeds what's requested? 

  3. I think it's a little dangerous to make some of the assumptions m-ttl has made in this thread. As someone currently in one of "those" programs, I should emphasize that my peers are comprise a surprisingly diverse lot. I mean diverse in all its senses. Not everyone wants to be a professor. A friend is currently doing a year at MoMA. 

     

    And, entirely anecdotally, I certainly do not fit the "privileged" framework, hence why I say it is risky to make such blanket assumptions. 

     

    As for museum work, I'm not sure you have in mind. A lot of "museum work" involves research that can compete with the best "academic" research out there. Many people here have past museum experience, or have worked at museums/archives as part of their graduate training. Clearly, the emphasis is on *research* rather than, say, organizing day-trips for high schoolers. Much depends on what, exactly, you wish to achieve. 

  4. There is a reasonably acceptable list: http://arthistorynewsletter.com/blog/?p=5204

     

    However that's from 2011, and there have been shake-ups since. Nemerov and soon Joselit aren't/won't be at Yale, so depending on who comes in, there will be some movement. Darby English left Chicago for Williams, but Chicago in general has made some big hires. The rest of your list seems acceptable, but I'm not sure I'd agree with Stanford's inclusion.

  5. Oh wow, I didn't know Darby English left Chicago. 

     

    But yes, there is huge emphasis on interdisciplinary work between Art History and Cinema and Media Studies there. Dan Morgan, who just joined CMS there, is co-authoring a book on film and philosophy with Richard Neer (who I believe is already affiliated with CMS despite being primarily in Art History). Gunning and Tsivian both regularly offer courses of interest to both disciplines. And as pointed out, WJT Mitchell and Lauren Berlant both work on cross-disciplinary issues. It really is a fantastic place for anyone interested in modern/contemporary work (because a lot of contemporary art moves between CMS and more traditional "art history").

  6. Are you talking about UVA? That was the only school on my list that required mailing materials that I recall. Saves them the printing and the ink I suppose, but a little bit of an unusual hassle in this day and age!

    University of Iowa, if I remember, also requires mailed-in materials. This was for the Film Studies program, but it's housed in the Dept. of Cinema and Comp Lit.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use