Thank you both! I appreciate your thoughtful feedback.
I am a resident of California - so UW is only marginally more expensive than UCLA (The UC system isn't a cheap public institution!). Seattle won't require a car (I can use my partners if need be), while LA will (with gas, insurance etc.). Furthermore, I think rent will be less expensive in Seattle. There is less than a 10K difference in tuition between the two, and I think other living expenses will even out the overall cost for both schools. Thus, cost isn't the biggest factor in my decision between the two.
As for research experience, I'm familiar with faculty who study HIV/AIDS as I've worked in field for a few years now and have set up research opportunities at both UCLA, and UW.
My thought at this point is that, obviously, both are strong programs. Nonetheless, I am getting a feeling that UW has overall, more resources than UCLA. They seem to have newer facilities, larger faculty, more research clusters, more student groups (that they detail on their website). Can anyone speak to this?
Thanks again!