Hey chocolatecheesecake, many thanks for your detailed reply. I think you are right about the approach that I should be taking. Instead, I have already written to them and they have come back with the list of professors that I should be looking at. Few on my list are : Jennifer Bussell (http://gspp.berkeley.edu/directories/faculty/jennifer-bussell), Alain de Janvry, Hilary Hoynes, Rucker Johnson, and Eugene Smolensky, among others.
I will certainly write to them at the earliest.
In addition, the equations have clearly changed. I have just received an admit from NUS, with full funding, stipend, travel and other allowances and even accomodation expense. If I go for it, I will perhaps have huge saving by the end of course whereas in case of GSPP, I will incur enormous cost relatively. Now this proposition terribly changes the proposition. It becomes GSPP versus NUS. I believe joining NUS will not give me access to global public policy elite and keep asia focused. The right network will elude me. Plus, a phd from a more reputed institute will further become distant. You know my area of interests, and I want to get into global policy advocacy before stepping back into India with experience and goodwill.
does not GSPP fit better in my picture? Do you think trading that kind of money for long term goal is justified? Are there any things that should I be looking at while doing a comparison. Prof. Brussel's research precisely maps what I want to learn.
thanks a lot for bearing with me!