Jump to content

lxwllms

Members
  • Posts

    68
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lxwllms

  1. On 2/25/2016 at 4:07 PM, emmabear said:

    Thanks, How was the quality of the building - cleanliness, maintenance, roaches (agrh)?  

    buildings are clean and well taken care of! maintenance is fast and the management isn't on your back or anything like that. its a good place to live. 

  2. 16 hours ago, emmabear said:

    Can maybe somebody recommend good dog friendly apartments in Davis to look at? We need 2 bedrooms...So far we found Greystone, Lakeshore and Eastlake as possible options. 

    I previously lived at the grove in west davis and it was very pet friendly. lots of dogs and cats.

  3. Seconding what the poster khunconan said. I think it depends on where you apply and also what types of programs you are applying to (i.e. something like clinical psych will be more competitive than other programs). Your other qualifications are pretty good so I wouldn't stress too badly about your scores so long as you apply wisely like khunconan said.

    Another thing I just thought of: you will probably want to make sure the PIs you're talking to are able to take on international students. See how that usually works for the school/program you're applying to because that might also play a factor.

  4. I'm a hulu/netflix person. I'm making my way back through Gilmore Girls. But am currently watching all the superhero/comic stuff: Flash, Arrow, Agent Carter, Agents of Shield, IZombie. The last list is completely the fault of the guy though and they tend to be on once I get home from campus!

    Have you tried daredevil?

  5. I got in with a 3.1 to many great universities straight out of undergrad. Many of these universities stated much higher GPAs as their average. So, I would take it as just that -- an average. It's fair I think to ask an administrative person this question as well.

  6. Essentially, you're commiting 5-7 years of your life to this not including the prep and application years. It's not something you want to rush. Solid research experience not only demonstrates novice expertise but also that you understand the dynamics of the field and it is something you truly want to explore in graduate school.

    Agree. This is along the lines of what I was trying to say.

  7. Uhm…. I think you’re misinterpreting what I said. I never said that only people who are in well-known labs with well-known PIs will get into clinical programs. What I’m saying is that there is a big spectrum of possibilities in cases like this and each one can offset any potential negative consequences of others. For example, if the OP got into Dr Kahneman’s lab from Princeton and ended up even with a conference paper where (s)he’s somewhere in the author list, I can guarantee you that nobody would care about only having 6 months of experience. The reputation of the PI and the lab would outweigh that. But if you can’t get into a place like that then yeah, sure, time starts to matter a little bit more.

    I don't think that's what you were saying so sorry if it came off that way. I agree that having that type of experience will off-set time.

    I was simply giving my opinion that getting on a paper isn't likely to happen in 6 months, regardless of how well-known the PI is. It COULD happen, but I don't think it's wise for OP to bet that it will.

    I think being in the lab for a long period of time would better OPs application in terms of experience obviously, but would also make sure OP knows this is a field they want to continue in. Pointing out that time is valuable. That's all.

  8. Thanks!

    Sorry to ask another question, but if I were able to arrange a research position within a month (overwhelmingly likely through volunteering), would it be worth applying this fall to programs with the expectation that I would continue in this position for the next year until the program starts? Or is that probably unlikely to be enough research to get me into a good school? I would prefer to apply this year if possible...

    Are you saying, starting research within June/July 2015, applying by December 2015 (likely less than 6mo research experience) and hoping they will look at your application and assume that because you wouldn't be starting a program until ~sept 2016, that you'd have over a year of experience?

    That's possible but a gamble IMO for a program like clinical where it is so competitive. I disagree that you need to work in a well-known lab with a well-known PI. That isn't always "do-able". What's more important for your application IMO is that you have a good experience (not just running participants as previously stated) and that your experience is long enough to show that you know you want to stay in research. Which 6mos will likely not do for you, assuming the schools don't think about the length of your experience in the way you're hoping.

    I agree that getting a paper will help your application, but again I don't think this is likely to happen in 6mos.

  9. I'm a neuroscience applicant for Fall 2015, and I agree with the advice you've already been given. Additionally I would like to say -- don't sell yourself short. You have some good stats. Mine were somewhat lower than yours, in terms of GPA, and I interviewed and was accepted at some great universities. If you want to talk "name schools" I was interviewed/accepted to an Ivy Neuroscience program (I almost didn't apply because I thought I wasn't good enough). My point is, don't purposely avoid "name" schools for fear of rejection. In doing so you're ultimately rejecting yourself.

     

    Just make sure you do well on your GRE, continue with research through your senior year (potentially do a senior/honors thesis?) like eteshoe has already said, and apply to programs that have a good "fit". That will become more clear as you continue through the application process. If you have any specific questions that you think I might be able to answer, feel free to PM me.

  10. Mad Men, GoT, Better Call Saul, Grey's Anatomy. I love Hannibal and recommend it to anyone that can handle gory-ish stuff. Loved Dexter up to season 6. My guilty pleasure is Property Brothers (HGTV), Cutthroat kitchen (Food Network), and this incredibly trashy MTV reality show called "Are You The One?" I'm also watching many different anime series currently.

    Didn't realize how much TV I watch until I wrote this...

  11. Seconding computer science and programming. I worked in a visual perception lab for about two years and we did almost everything with Matlab and psych toolbox. Even if your school doesn't offer a matlab course (mine did, but I've heard this is strange..) take a course in programming or CS. Definitely a great skill to have, regardless of whether or not you ultimately move into cognitive psych.

    As far as other classes go, I'm not sure. Neuropsych classes if your uni offers it. Maybe cognitive science courses. You might be able to take grad courses in these topics and count them towards your degree (something I did).

    Also, I agree that this oversaturation seems like more of a clinical/social thing.

  12. I agree with everything the above posters said. I'm a biology undergrad moving into behavioral neuroscience for graduate school.

    As they've already said, the biggest thing is honing in on your interests, you want those to be relatively clear when you actually go to apply/interview. I was someone who started out in cognitive labs because I was attracted to the material. But I realized that what I was doing (neuroimaging, working with human subjects) wasn't really for me, and I moved into heavy molecular stuff. I've found somewhat of a balance in behavior (I'm interested in molecular mechanisms underlying stress and anxiety).

    I would also recommend connecting with your research mentor(s) and professors. You want them to know who you are so you have great LORs, which play a pretty important role in the application process I've been told.

    Also, as far as applying to programs: don't let prestige/rankings be your end all be all. That's not to say rank isn't important, it is in some contexts, but you should base your search (and ultimately your decision) on things like research interests, potential faculty you can work with, liveable funding (I'd bold "liberal" if I wasn't replying through my phone), overall program fit, etc. When you're choosing schools ask yourself, what do I want to do, and how can this program help me accomplish that? A good fit is very important and certainly something that will increase your chances.

    Tl;dr: figure out your interests, get to know your professors, be smart when choosing programs, have an idea of your career goals (this is getting a bit ahead of myself, but...)

  13. It would be difficult of me to commit to B without certainty that badmouthing would not occur. At the same time, I cannot imagine spending the next two years with these people.

    Not committing to B would mean what? Going with A? Not going anywhere? You need to forget about this whole badmouthing thing. If you don't commit to B you will either end up at A (which sounds like a terrible enviornment) or reapplying. Why reapply when you could just go to B, a program you like?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use