Jump to content

Milkyways

Members
  • Posts

    122
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Milkyways

  1. I really feel for the enrolled students, after all the effort they put into applying to, then attending USC. And I applaud their decision to leave, it shows they are a solid group. USC's response is shameful, I would have expected that someone in the institution take responsibility about what happened, and it makes me really sad to see that USC as a whole entity does not seem to care about their situation. USC's program was one of my long shots, a highly respected program with a long tradition of great faculty and alumni. It is really sad, because this only confirms the idea of art education becoming more and more a commodity and a hyper capitalized business than an academic or cultural force. Moreover, it is simply and clearly unethical to change the terms of an agreement that was already made. For those of us who applied this year it happened too in a much lesser degree, but it gives us the impression that USC really needs to settle on what is going on in regards with the MFA. When I applied in January, the funding stated on the website, as well as the faculty, were different from what they are now. Frances Stark left ( apparently, in bad terms), Tala Madani wasn't on the graduate faculty list anymore, and the "great funding" that I was offered was 15k for the first year (out of 40k/year for tuition only). For the second year, I could compete for a T.A. but they were extremely clear about this T.A. being highly competitive. So if they somehow deceived us and this was frustrating ($100 we could have spent on another application, not counting transcripts and other documents I had to send as a international) I can't imagine what the enrolled students are going through now. I still hope that someone in USC rises to the occasion and fixes this situation. If it doesn't happen, future USC applicants, BEWARE.
  2. I really feel for the enrolled students, after all the effort they put into applying to, then attending USC. And I applaud their decision to leave, it shows they are a solid group. USC's response is shameful, I would have expected that someone in the institution take responsibility about what happened, and it makes me really sad to see that USC as a whole entity does not seem to care about their situation. USC's program was one of my long shots, a highly respected program with a long tradition of great faculty and alumni. It is really sad, because this only confirms the idea of art education becoming more and more a commodity and a hyper capitalized business than an academic or cultural force. Moreover, it is simply and clearly unethical to change the terms of an agreement that was already made. For those of us who applied this year it happened too in a much lesser degree, but it gives us the impression that USC really needs to settle on what is going on in regards with the MFA. When I applied in January, the funding stated on the website, as well as the faculty, were different from what they are now. Frances Stark left ( apparently, in bad terms), Tala Madani wasn't on the graduate faculty list anymore, and the "great funding" that I was offered was 15k for the first year (out of 40k/year for tuition only). For the second year, I could compete for a T.A. but they were extremely clear about this T.A. being highly competitive. So if they somehow deceived us and this was frustrating ($100 we could have spent on another application, not counting transcripts and other documents I had to send as a international) I can't imagine what the enrolled students are going through now. I still hope that someone in USC rises to the occasion and fixes this situation. If it doesn't happen, future USC applicants, BEWARE.
  3. Hey there, nice to meet you. I got the NetId not long after I accepted the offer, something like two months ago. You might want to email your department about it or International Office. I am thinking of going to Engelhart initially (I'll be going to Evanston, I'm unsure wether your MS is taught there or not), and then I'd like to rent a room with a Chicagoan local for a while, so I get personal insight of the city. On-campus is quite expensive in my opinion, especially if you want a private room. After a while I'd prefer to have a studio apt or find a roommate to share a flat in Evanston. I think it's easier this way so you can actually see where you are going to live and not rely on craiglist pictures etc.
  4. Accepted to MFA art theory and practice (international)
  5. Perfect example of why "more expensive art education" doesn't mean "better art education".
  6. Just went though Bataille Story if the eye (second time in my life, it's very good) The blue of noon L'abbé C L'érotisme Now reading other of his essays. Recommended!
  7. That's great news! SFAI and SF sounds awesome Congrats!
  8. This is what I've heard, nothing from experience, but it might help. I've heard Hunter is not so strong in theoretical rigor as a program per se (heard this from an mfa student-curator), but with the amount of faculty and visiting artists you would probably find a niche (Calarts offers you the opposite, a very thorough- yet limited- concentration in critical studies and theory ). Hunter has tons of people coming and you are close to other important universities in case you want to attend their events too. I would go to NYC for academic purposes, and LA for the overall life experience.
  9. Going to Northwestern! I hope decision making is over for everybody soon too. I've found it to be as exhausting as waiting to hear back from schools. Now done with procastination and let the work begin Nice grad school experiences for everybody, time to keep working!
  10. Yup I thought the same. It seems slightly unethical.
  11. Anyone accepted to USC Roski actually going? Despite the fact I had told them their new financial offer wouldn't work for me (waitlisted) , they still sent me a letter of acceptance. I am really surprised by what has been happening with Roski and can't even imagine the chaos they are going though, yet I wonder if it would have been best for them not to have had an application process this year. At first Frances Stark's departure and the Dr Dre thing didn't bother me much, but then the whole application process became really erratic and I believe this could really make people who applied there upset, since the program seems to be completely different. Any opinions? I just hope future candidates have the chance to be more informed about all this.
  12. I got an email from USC suggesting that there might be a spot available if not being fully funded (40%) is not a problem for me. :/
  13. I plan on teaching and I guess my choices were both related to solid academic bases and critical view points and good funding (I'll choose the program which offers me the best mix). I'd say you need to find something in between your possibilities and your ambitions.
  14. Carter, I think the thing with these funding sources is that they are very specific. They often depend on the region, the media, the message of your work, your gender and nationality. I myself have only found a couple that would work for me (international female), but I get the impression there are lots of them for residents. http://www.aauw.org/what-we-do/educational-funding-and-awards/american-fellowships/ http://www.newyorkartists.net/category/grants-for-artists/ https://www.elizabethgreenshieldsfoundation.org/ Finding funding is something that requires lots of research and I'd say the best way to go is to google "grants for artists" and progressively select the ones that work for you. I also am pretty sure that your universities have financial offices with complete data bases of external funding opportunities. I believe UCLA, or USC ( I really don't remember) have made these databases public. It's worth checking the funding opportunities in big universities since they often apply for any school.
  15. It's been quite a long discussion. I believe it comes down to the fact that it's still relatively expensive (3 years paying 9 K each + living expenses), which would still require a 50-something-k loan, alongside the presumption it seems to be focused on/limited to Pittsburgh's art scene. I guess people think that if they need to get a study loan, they might as well re-apply to programs that are better connected/located in more artistically open areas. I'd say the program is in a gray area where you're not sure if it is worth the price tag or if in the end you'll probably get the same from lesser known programs that offer better funding. The quality of the program hasn't been under any discussion, it is a very good and innovative program. I would have gone if i had had the money
  16. I would say USC with the T.A. stipend. Without it Bard and its proximity to NY would be my pick
  17. Hello Corey. If you don't mind, could you give us more details about how funding is structured in UCSD? I would really appreciate it
  18. The first stage of the application was not very stressful for me. I didn't feel I had much to lose. But having to decide has made me feel under so much stress it even modified my sleep patterns. I guess picking out a school is a down to earth decision and you feel it carries the responsibility of determining the future of your whole life. Still you can always transfer if you're not satisfied (I would rather avoid this of course, but it does help to imagine options). I think that in your case all three programs are fantastic. And fully funded! You just need to figure out which one is the best fit for you: faculty, facilities, program's philosophy, personal goals and location. I don't know your work but I'd definitely would be between Rutgers (proximity to NYC) and I believe generous stipend , and UCSD (reputability and solid conceptual base). I myself have considered attending the phd there after the mfa. We'll see. Good luck with your decision, any option you pick will be fantastic, and UCSD is indeed an amazing program.
  19. Some schools offered me very good funding, but it wasn't enough to pay for expenses and they were too secluded so it would have been hard for me to find a job to support myself. As an international I can't apply to loans here and the ones from my country have very specific requirements which I couldn't meet this year.
  20. Yes. I've been mailing the internationals and they all love it without reservations.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use