
Cromulent Flurp
Members-
Posts
22 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Location
New Zealand
-
Application Season
2016 Fall
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
Cromulent Flurp's Achievements

Decaf (2/10)
12
Reputation
-
Adequate Philosopher reacted to a post in a topic: Facebook group for 2016 entrants
-
Cromulent Flurp started following Admissions Blog: Hello and Predictions , Facebook group for 2016 entrants , Choosing Between Offers and 1 other
-
Absolutely!
-
Adequate Philosopher reacted to a post in a topic: Facebook group for 2016 entrants
-
AnotherKantFan reacted to a post in a topic: Facebook group for 2016 entrants
-
MentalEngineer reacted to a post in a topic: Facebook group for 2016 entrants
-
FettuccineAlfrege reacted to a post in a topic: Facebook group for 2016 entrants
-
gughok reacted to a post in a topic: Facebook group for 2016 entrants
-
The Facebook group for applicants turned out to be very supportive, friendly, and entertaining, so we've decided to keep it going, but changed the name to Philosophy Graduate Entrants 2016. The idea is that as we go through the no doubt challenging years of our PhDs we'll have a group of friends at different departments going through the same things, and it's great to have a friendly network of students at just about every department you can think of. Feel free to join! https://www.facebook.com/groups/503589463155698/
-
Cromulent Flurp reacted to a post in a topic: Decisions 2016
-
Cromulent Flurp reacted to a post in a topic: Decisions 2016
-
FettuccineAlfrege reacted to a post in a topic: Decisions 2016
-
gughok reacted to a post in a topic: Decisions 2016
-
I'm leaning very strongly towards WashU, gughok. The person I'd like to work with there, who's the person I'd most like to work with in the world, was on the committee and is very enthusiastic about me going there. She's planning on staying there too. I won't decide till I visit there and Boulder, though. I'm glad you're feeling more positive about the possibility of going to Harvard. Something to keep in mind with things not turning out ideally is that that's what a career in philosophy tends to consist of much of the time. You'll have to face publications being rejected by everywhere regularly, or not getting into the journals you'd like them to, and applying for jobs usually means getting rejected from dozens of places and having to accept whatever you get as well. I think using the opportunity to build one's acceptance and determination is a good idea.
-
Cromulent Flurp reacted to a post in a topic: Visiting Questions
-
gughok reacted to a post in a topic: Decisions 2016
-
I started a thread on this, called "Choosing between offers". It didn't take off though, so I'm happy for a new one to start.
-
Cromulent Flurp reacted to a post in a topic: Pick either of two: Rank or Location
-
Cromulent Flurp reacted to a post in a topic: Choosing Between Offers
-
Thanks very much, Brush. I've been looking at Denver actually, and see a lot of things there that would remove St Louis's advantage over Boulder, but I don't drive (I cycle) and it's a remarkable hour and a half by bus. On the other hand, I am so into outdoor activities that Boulder would be amazing.
-
Cromulent Flurp reacted to a post in a topic: Choosing Between Offers
-
I expect I'm not the only one who already has a difficult choice to make between offers. Mine is between Boulder and WashU, and I specialize in ethics and metaethics. I'm really into the outdoors, but am an international student and more interested in living in heartland America than somewhere mostly white and rich, and I would like to keep working with underprivileged kids, which St Louis would be good for. (I also really like the great things for kids there, like the museums, zoo, and amusement parks; that's the kind of thing I do for fun in a city). Significantly, the WashU offer is for six years, rather than five, and the funding per year is much higher than at Boulder. Boulder has more people doing ethics, but Julia Driver at WashU would be one of the best people anywhere for me to work with. Any thoughts, and what's your dilemma?
-
It's certainly possible, as I did it twice. (Leading journals in the relevant areas, that is.) I didn't publish them *when* an undergraduate, I published them during my Master's, but they were written before my Master's. One was an essay, the other a section of an essay. I wrote them during my Honours year, which in the non-US country I'm in counts as graduate, but I'm told by American faculty is equivalent to the fourth year of a US BA. (BAs here are three years.)
- 7 replies
-
- german
- philosophy
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Cromulent Flurp reacted to a post in a topic: 2016 Acceptance Thread
-
Cromulent Flurp reacted to a post in a topic: German philosophy journals?
-
brush reacted to a post in a topic: German philosophy journals?
-
You’d think that publications would be really impressive for committees. I worked out that only 3% of students at top programmes had publications before or during the first year of their PhD, and of course many of those were in obscure journals. But in fact it (and the quality of your writing sample) matters much less than things like what institution you come from, I think. I published two of my undergraduate essays, one, which I used for my writing sample, in one of the top three or four ethics journals, and the other in a leading applied ethics journal. I worked out that less than 1% of students at top programmes had publications in journals as highly ranked as those I published in before starting their PhD. I used the same writing sample last year, when it was at the R&R stage, and got in nowhere. This year so far I’m 1a/4r, the acceptance being from my safety school, and am waiting on 5 programmes that are as or more prestigious than the ones I’ve been rejected from. I have the feeling that at prestigious programmes writing samples only count in deciding between people coming from other top institutions. Having said that, I might not have even had that one acceptance without my publications, so they may still help; but I don’t think a top programme will consider a published writing sample as being a big deal compared to a writing sample that isn’t of publishable quality, unless you’re coming from another top programme. Of course, this is guessing. And yes, I am a little bitter at the moment. My safety school is good though, so I'm only intermittently bitter.
- 7 replies
-
- german
- philosophy
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Cromulent Flurp reacted to a post in a topic: 2016 Acceptance Thread
-
Cromulent Flurp reacted to a post in a topic: 2016 Acceptance Thread
-
No, I only know last year's date was 15 December. Also, Princeton's last year was 31 December or early January, and this year was 15 December, so its notifications might be earlier than usual.
-
Thanks so much for doing this. Does the date for Duke take into account that their submission date was two weeks later than last time?
-
UCLA--inconsistency on form and .pdf question
Cromulent Flurp replied to philapgirl's topic in Philosophy
I've had something similar happen on my Michigan application, with the PDF showing incorrect details that I'd changed (and saved) on the form. I haven't been able to find a way to change the details that show on the PDF, or get help from Michigan. They said they can't change anything once the form is submitted, but I didn't submit it (they don't seem to realize how their system works). I'm still trying to get clear from them whether the error only appears on my copy and not theirs. -
It's working fine for me. Have you tried using a different browser?
-
Would people be interested in a Facebook group?
Cromulent Flurp replied to Cromulent Flurp's topic in Philosophy
I've created the group, here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/503589463155698/ As there are only three of us, it would be really helpful if you could let other applicants you know about the group so we can build up some numbers. I'll make a new post on Grad Cafe to announce that the group exists, too.