Hey everyone,
I'm compiling my list of PhD programs to apply to this coming fall, and I've found myself a bit split as to what kind of program to apply to. A little background about my interests: I work in LME, with a particular interest in urban destruction and reconstruction as sociopolitical processes. I completed my thesis last semester on the topic of architectural reconstruction in the Belgian town of Ypres following WWI, which followed much along this vein. The thesis dedicated equal airtime to both examination of structures ( for instance: this building features x style, this street was rebuilt with y additions) and agents (for example: the British hoped to maintain the town as a permanent memorial). As such, I wouldn't say I was clearly more interested in one aspect over the other.
I'll be continuing my research on this same topic throughout the master's program that I have secured, in the hope of refining my interests. But in the meanwhile, what do you guys think? Is it better to apply to a traditional history department and work with an emphasis in urban history, or is it alright to apply to a PhD program like Cornell's HAUD (History of Architecture and Urban Development) or MIT'S HCT (History, Theory, and Criticism...of architecture)? Though I've heard great things about the latter two programs, I've also been cautioned by many of my professors against applying to them. This is mostly for fear that they are "too interdisciplinary", rather than the programs not being a good fit for me.