Jump to content

Monody

Members
  • Content Count

    197
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Monody

  1. I would recommend Europe and preferably German universities given that there is no tuition and such approaches are quite popular outside the few quant-heavy departments in Mannheim, Konstanz, Bonn or Heidelberg.

  2. 54 minutes ago, Bibica said:

    I agree with @VMcJ. Although I would also say that within the Top 5 or 7 (basically, CHYMPS + Berkeley, etc.) your personal fit with the faculty matters much more than the subfield rankings. This is especially true for comparative politics, I think, where some programs are really strong in some regions but not in others (Stanford, for example, has only one Latin Americanist that I know of. Columbia, much further down the rankings, has 2 or 3.)

    Let's not kid ourselves. Everyone knows that the C in CHYMPS stays for Columbia, just as much as the P stands for PSU. ;)

  3. PROFILE:


    Type of Undergrad Institution: Somewhat known international university
    Major(s)/Minor(s): Political Science
    Undergrad GPA: 3.8
    Type of Grad: N.A.
    Grad GPA: N.A.


    GRE: 163/169/5.5


    Any Special Courses: Statistics I, Statistics II, Social Science Research Methods, Survey Design, Econometrics I, Econometrics II, Causal Inference, Analysis of Panel Data


    Letters of Recommendation: Method prof whose lecture I took and who heard very positive things from others (was the first one in years who aced all the Statistics exams), IR prof at my home university with whom I had two courses, AP at my exchange university for whom I am an RA (free of charge)


    Research Experience: thesis, sent one manuscript off before my applications, lots of long term papers (16 times 4500 to 6000 words with original research questions and quant methods)


    Teaching Experience: None though the department of the Method prof offered me a TA but I transferred which made this impossible


    Subfield/Research Interests: Civil Wars
    Other: 3 languages more or less in addition to my mother tongue and English

    RESULTS:
    Acceptances($$ or no $$): Columbia ($$), Penn State ($$), ETH Zurich MACIS (MA, $$)
    Waitlists: NYU
    Rejections: Duke, MIT, Stanford, Princeton
    Pending: None
    Going to: Columbia

     

    LESSONS LEARNED:

    •  It's probably a two-tale story. On the one hand, you can get into your preferred university if you work really hard. There have been few days on which I didn't do anything and I always took 1.5 times the regular course load or more and could have probably had my degree after 2 years were it not for a technicality with the transfer and funding requirements. That may have shown and now I am really happy with the outcome.
    • Also never wait for others or blame limited opportunities. If you are interested in something be it advanced methods, game theory or a specific substantive subfield, just google for good introductory books, the main journals, and so forth and start reading. You won't get any younger and it will never hurt to have learned/read more than it would have been required.
    • That said I would not advise anyone to do the same as I did, because the probability that you shoot yourself in the foot is too high if you first transfer and then take an exchange year, because there will be few profs who know you well, few opportunities to get a RA position, and it will send a lot of mixed signals as some others also mentioned to me
    • I would probably just recommend a lot of hard work and a stable undergraduate degree and you should be set. 

     

    SOP: You dont want to read it. It becomes worse by the second.

     

  4. 1) I can only partially speak for Columbia as it is the school I am going to, but it seems to me like funding after the fifth year is pretty certain given how regularly it is alluded to in the material they provide on the website.

    2) I guess whether you feel overworked depends on what kind of person you are, how you work, and how fast and efficient you are at it and maybe less on the program. Personally, I wake up every morning at 6 and work from 8AM (10AM on the weekends) to 17:30+PM and then go to bed at 10 PM. Some would say that this is excessive (my grand-mother), others would consider it as normal. I would be bored if I wouldn't do it and if I were to only focus on the courses I am taking now, I would only do stuff on two days a week which would feel frustrating. In sum, in your place I would ask myself what kind of person I am and then contact current graduate students at the departments to ask about their experience to do some comparisons.

    3) Given their rank, I would say that they may be both generally good. But again, it depends on what you are actually interested in. I do IR and for example didn't apply at Havard because they quasi-literally have nobody who is working in my field of interest. Columbia on the other hand is practically a dream come true.

  5. 2 minutes ago, resDQ said:

    that is a good point. It is a Friday! Don't think about it until Monday.

     

    Wouldn't it make the recruitment visit awkward then? 

    Ay. I may also write a short email to Gelman and ask whether Columbia can offer comparable training to NYU's. 

    It doesn't have to be awkward. It's a great way to get some books across the Atlantic without paying for shipping.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.