Huh. I find these extremely interesting to read through. Thanks everyone for sharing!
I only discovered this site last week: after I got my first acceptance letter I looked around curious whether other people were announcing their application results.
I went through the application process as though in a vacuum. I don't think I would have done anything differently if I had been accessing this sort of information, I just would have been even more painfully stressed. I am glad I was not thinking about these things even more than I was; such is my temperament.
Program Applied To: MPP
Schools Applied To: UC Berkeley, Carnegie Mellon (MSPPM), U. Michigan, U. Chicago, Harvard
Schools Admitted To: Carnegie Mellon [$17k/yr], U. Michigan, U. Chicago
Schools Rejected From: UC Berkeley, Harvard
Still Waiting: nope, all done.
Undergraduate institution: UC Berkeley
Undergraduate GPA: 3.1
Last 60 hours of Undergraduate GPA (if applicable):
Undergraduate Majors: Mathematics, Political Science
GRE Quantitative Score: 800
GRE Verbal Score: 750
GRE AW Score: 5.0
Years Out of Undergrad (if applicable): 4
Years of Work Experience: ~3.5
Describe Relevant Work Experience: two short internship stints at a tech-policy-focused non-profit public interest law firm. 3 yrs doing policy and legal compliance at a web 2.0-ish company.
Strength of SOP (be honest, describe the process, etc): Berkeley is the only one of the programs I applied to that asks for anything of real length. The others were all just dinky little things.
As others above noted, Cal's deadline was a month+ earlier than any others. I slaved months on my long piece for Cal, and believed it a great essay. So did the biased friends and family who read it for me. I recounted my passion and the importance of my work of the past few years, and crowned it with a tiny paragraph about pursuing a graduate degree. It was a splendid piece of writing, in my humble humble self-emphatuated opinion, but I can imagine three potentially huge problems with it in the eyes of a reader:
- too passionate. I acknowledge that I am capable of sounding a bit crazy.
- too focused on a particular topic. To someone looking for a candidate with my interests, surely I must look great! To someone not looking for that, surely I must look notgreat!
- not enough about the value I anticipate deriving from pursuing a Master's in public policy.
As for all the dinky essays... this aspect of the application process is what annoyed me most: every program asks the same thing, with slightly different permutations of word count limits for answering each part. I haphazardly sliced and diced my Cal essays to fit the requirements of the other programs.
[[back during the application season, I was actually thinking about putting my essays up on the web. I didn't have any particular reason to, it just struck me as the sort of thing that probably most people would shy away from without reason. The couple people I mentioned this intention to were like "OMG you can't do that!" and I was like "orly?" and they were like "at least not until after application season!" and then I guess I kinda forgot about it.
Do you guys share those here? [or I suppose I could search for related topics...]]]
Strength of LOR's (be honest, describe the process, etc): I don't know. I didn't read any of them. Not as great as they could have been
2 from people at work I believe competent to speak to my work performance and abilities, who I think could have interestingly different perspectives. 1 from a prof I took a graduate seminar with my last year at Berkeley.
I actually took several relevant grad classes in my last semesters, with great faculty at the top of their fields, @Boalt, SIMS and GSPP. I didn't establish strong relationships with the profs, and didn't keep in touch with them.
Here's a piece of serious advice for anyone still in undergrad: develop real relationships with your profs, and keep those relationships alive after you graduate! Or tell them about your future plans (public policy is commonly an "after a few years of work" sort of thing) and have them write a letter for you to keep on record with your school for later use.
Other: It was by no means a certainty in my mind, going in, that anything could overcome my horrendous undergrad transcript. My GRE was reasonable, and I think my resume looks pretty good. But I honestly expected to not get in anywhere.
It's nice when going through something like this to have a job you don't completely hate.