Sorry to hear uwGradStudent. It sure sounds like you've really accomplished a lot!! I have no idea why it wouldn't be accepted, perhaps the way your application was put together didn't highlight all of this (i.e. it might have had it listed, but perhaps the reviewer didn't fully get the grasp of what roll YOU played in each of the publications). Very though to say. With regards to the grades, I know that is always my weak point. I finished undergrad with I think a 3.2 or 3.3 average (out of a possible 4.3). Throughout undergrad however my grades started off really low, and climbed at the end, so the average surely is not reflective of the ending status. On top of that, during my first year of grad studies I received 4.0 out of 4.0 (mostly all A+s with the highest mark in nearly all my courses [i took 9 courses in my first year of grad school]), and when I applied for CIHR last year, one of the reviewers gave me an academic score of 3.2/4.9 while the other gave me 2.8/4.9. The highest of all grades amongst my peers in grad school and I get a score of 2.8??? I was a bit shocked at the time... honestly who knows. I guess the reviewers probably have hundreds of applications to look at, so it is very easy for them to miss details?? Alternatively (not sure if you applied for Vanier as well), but maybe my theory above (see post 186) was correct, and if you get a Vanier, maybe they won't send you an acceptance on the NSERC (crappy news for me if that's the case). I think you can request info from NSERC however as to why your application was not accepted - maybe get down to the bottom of the mystery!